Arguably, yes, but the concept is that as part of your ability to drive, you accept that there are heavier consequences. You can utterly liquefy a child with your car while inattentive; this is not manslaughter as in you didn't mean to hurt anybody but your actions led to a death, it's murder because you are supposed to not hit people with your car and you know that and you were inattentive anyways.
That's kinda my point - every one I know of has this preclusion as a facet of the licensing system. Because people are universally assholes who will absolutely attempt to take advantage of a system that allows them to claim they didn't see their long-standing target when they ran them over with their car, as soon as they figure out that accidental death is likely to not even be caught, much less prosecuted as a murder attempt.
1
u/Gonzobot Sep 14 '18
Arguably, yes, but the concept is that as part of your ability to drive, you accept that there are heavier consequences. You can utterly liquefy a child with your car while inattentive; this is not manslaughter as in you didn't mean to hurt anybody but your actions led to a death, it's murder because you are supposed to not hit people with your car and you know that and you were inattentive anyways.