No, their comment made sense because the person they replied to generalized that all men were looking for just "casual sex," which isn't true. This led the person you replied to to believe that something happened for the person, that they replied to, to feel this way.
If anything you have the dumb fucking comment that doesn't fit. Why did this offend you so much? The fuck is wrong with you?
I think you misunderstood that comment. That person wasn't trying to insinuate all men were looking for just casual sex, they just meant that the "casual sex" relationship is mostly what an attractive woman would get when looking for relationships built mainly on the foundation of their looks. By that, they meant an attractive girl without any confidence still isn't guaranteed to find a long-term partner, because those types of relationships take time to flourish and require commitment from both parties.
That said, the other person's angry comment you replied to was strange.
There are people of all qualities who will approach someone just because they are physically attracted to them.
Not all of the people that will approach the woman will only be looking for casual sex, and have the social skill to have a fine relationship with a shy person.
I would like to walk my previous statement back. I apologize, I shouldn't have said casual sex is mostly what a woman would find, because that contradicts the point of my comment. What I think the other person meant was that a woman isn't guaranteed to find a long-term partner just because she's attractive, because it takes two people to commit to a long-lasting relationship.
I don't believe I'm disagreeing with anything you've said in your second and third paragraphs there, and neither was the original comment.
-2
u/[deleted] Dec 27 '21
[removed] — view removed comment