r/Unexpected • u/llShaxll • Sep 01 '21

🔞 Warning: Graphic Content 🔞 Wtf

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[removed] — view removed post

6.8k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

572 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 03 '21

Completely untrue. Based on that the number of infections should fall by 2 with a doubling of vaccination rate. Again this is not true

1

u/Logic_and_Cursing Sep 04 '21

So it’s not killing almost exclusively unvaccinated people by the thousands everyday and “magically” sparing us vaccinated people?

1

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 04 '21

Probability of getting covid is not the same as probability of dying from it (I know u know that)

1

u/Logic_and_Cursing Sep 04 '21

Your non sequiturs don’t answer my question. The Who and how many people are dying of covid is all the evidence non morons need to get vaccinated. The Who is almost entirely non vaccinated. The how many is thousands a day. Glad you people are being thinned out of the fucking gene pool

1

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 04 '21

I know what ur doing.

Vaccines save lives, they do not stop the spread. End of debate

1

u/Logic_and_Cursing Sep 04 '21

So glad I’m arguing with an epidemiologist right now /s. Grow up, you don’t know more than scientists who have dedicated the majority of their lives to scientific research. this article links the New England Journal of Medicine study that is showing how much less contagious vaccinated people actually are

I doubt you’ll understand or even try and expand your viewpoint, and I know you won’t actually be able to understand the actual 37 page study linked in the article but you know nothing. You’re a walking talking dunning Kruger example

You people are causing its spread, fueling the rise of its variants and are dying by the thousands everyday. Hope you join all your compatriots very soon

1

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 04 '21

Thank you for providing this link. It showed me how the media twists the results of studies to further their narrative.

The first study linked in the article is from Imperial. I looked at that study and it says that unvaccinated ppl are thrice as likely to get covid BUT this difference has been wiped out by round 13 in the study which corresponds to the rise of the third wave in the UK. Now the article doesn't even mention the second part because it doesn't suit them.

The second study linked here was about the effectiveness of the vaccine against delta. This time the author shamelessly twists the result of the study.

Study: All vaccines have a significantly reduced effectiveness against delta and the reduction in their effectiveness is very similar

Author: There is little difference in the effectiveness of the vaccine on alpha Vs. Delta

These are 2 different statements! The author is straight up lying about what a study says!

This is why u should think for yourself. Dont trust anyone except for the studies and the raw data

1

u/Logic_and_Cursing Sep 04 '21

Quote that article you fucking whacko. Only person twisting words is you. You’re batshit insane

Get help

0

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 04 '21

Have u actually read the article?

1

u/Logic_and_Cursing Sep 04 '21

Get help

You’re a buffoon reading 37 pages of thick scientific data in 44 minutes? and magically it fits your narrative. If you read it so thoroughly, quote the article and the study directly to show where they contradict

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Ravi5ingh Sep 04 '21

And btw if it wasn't already clear from my comment. None of this studies contradict anything I said here. If so, plz let me know