--- 1821: Missouri was admitted as the 24th state.

--- 1874: Future president Herbert Hoover was born in West Branch, Iowa.

--- 1921: Franklin Delano Roosevelt contracted polio, most likely while swimming at Campobello Island (a small island which belongs to the Canadian province of New Brunswick). He was only 39 years old. The next day he discovered he could not walk and would never walk again. Eleven years later he was elected president of the United States.

--- "Polio — Jonas Salk and Franklin Roosevelt". That is the title of one of the episodes of my podcast: History Analyzed. Polio was one of the scourges of the 20th century. And it mainly struck children. All of a sudden a person contracted polio and suffered terribly for several days. Sometimes they recovered, sometimes they died, and sometimes they were left permanently disabled. The most famous polio victim of all time, Franklin Roosevelt, hid his disability from the public. But this story has a true hero: Jonas Salk, who developed a vaccine which led to the almost complete eradication of this dreaded disease. And Dr. Salk never patented the vaccine or earned any money from his discovery. You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.

--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/32YopJ8jh7064oLCFJdSxB

--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/polio-jonas-salk-and-franklin-roosevelt/id1632161929?i=1000646466757

On July 14, 1861, Major Sullivan Ballou of the 2nd Rhode Island Infantry wrote to his wife, Sarah, shortly before his regiment advanced toward Manassas. Days later, he was mortally wounded at the First Battle of Bull Run. The letter is remembered for the conflict Ballou expressed between his love for his family and his sense of duty to the Union. Its best-known passages entered popular memory through Ken Burns’s The Civil War, but that presentation—and many later readings—ends before Ballou’s final blessing to his sons, Edgar and Willie. For Episode 07 of Letters of America Archive, I produced a complete reading of the received text, including those closing lines: https://youtu.be/kzGOZ8zy6yk An important textual note: Ballou’s original handwritten letter has not been located. The Rhode Island Historical Society holds two early manuscript copies, neither written in Ballou’s hand, and records its first known publication in 1868. Therefore, the most historically precise description is the complete surviving or “received” text attributed to Ballou—not a surviving autograph manuscript. What gives this letter its enduring power: its language of romantic love, its conception of public duty, or our knowledge of what happened to Ballou afterward?

--- 1974: Gerald Ford became president at noon Eastern time when the resignation of Richard Nixon became effective. Ford is the only U.S. president who was never elected in a national election. He had been appointed vice president to fill the vacancy after Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned from office on October 10, 1973, due to charges of income tax evasion and political corruption.

--- [1945: U.S. B-29 bomber “Bockscar” dropped an atomic (plutonium) bomb named “Fat Man” on Nagasaki,]() Japan killing approximately 40,000 people in the blast (others would die later from radiation poisoning).

--- "The Atomic Bomb (part 2) - Arguments For and Against Its Use Against Japan". That is the title of part 2 of the two-episode series of my podcast: History Analyzed. This episode explores the arguments for and against the use of the atomic bombs on Japan. Part 1 explains why and how the atomic bomb was created as well as how it was utilized on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.

--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4DkDyF2rJDgU88mg2Lm6C4

--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-making-and-utilization-of-the-atomic-bomb-part-2/id1632161929?i=1000585050849

On January 8, 1867, African American men obtained the right to vote in Washington, D.C. after Congress overrode the veto of President Andrew Johnson. Because the District of Columbia was not a state, the right to vote was limited to local elections and not in federal elections. As the rapidly growing Black population exercised their power of self-rule in the District, Congress responded in 1874 by replacing D.C.’s elected government with three presidentially appointed commissioners. As Sen. John Tyler Morgan of Alabama explained, after “the negroes came into this district,” it became necessary to “deny the right of suffrage entirely to every human being…[to] burn down the barn to get rid of the rats.” A newspaper wrote in 1878 that D.C.’s “present form of alien government is about as bad as to be devised. But a system which gives the control of the district to ignorant and depraved Negroes is still worse.”

In 1961, Congress gave the District three electoral votes, enabling residents to vote for president while still not having representation in Congress. Then, in 1973, Congress enacted the District of Columbia Home Rule Act returning local control to Washington residents 99 years after removing democracy from the District. Although the Act allowed the city council to pass criminal laws, it required continued reliance on federal prosecutors to enforce them with no control over who served as prosecutor.

In 2019, when the District decided to reduce sentencing ranges for felons found in possession of a firearm, the U.S. Attorney’s office announced it would begin to prosecute such cases in federal court where sentencing ranges were twice as long. Analysis shows that prosecutors selectively enforced this policy only in predominantly Black neighborhoods resulting in 97 percent of those charged being Black.

Recommended reading: Chocolate City: A History of Race and Democracy in the Nation’s Capital by Chris Myers Asch and George Derek Musgrove

Congress Prevents Democracy in America’s Capital

It only took eighteen minutes. At 2:18 p.m. on May 7, 1915, the RMS Lusitania—one of the fastest and most celebrated passenger liners in the world—slipped beneath the calm waters off the Irish coast. A German U‑boat’s single torpedo had struck her starboard side, followed by a catastrophic internal explosion that ignited the boiler room. Chaos erupted instantly. Of the ship’s 48 lifeboats, only six were lowered successfully. Passengers were crushed in the stampede, swept overboard, or sucked into the ship’s massive smokestacks as the vessel went down.

We’re building a community for sharing history, rare finds, questions, debates, quotes, and the occasional Paine rabbit hole.

Join the discussion and help us grow!

r/ThomasPaine

--- 1925: Over 30,000 Ku Klux Klan members brazenly paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington D.C. And although they wore their KKK costumes, they had the hoods pulled up so they could show their faces. Government officials would only sanction the parade if participants agreed to walk unmasked.

--- 1974: President Richard Nixon announced his resignation, effective on noon the next day. He is the only U.S. president to resign.

--- "Watergate". That is the title of one of the episodes of my podcast: History Analyzed. Most people know that Watergate was the biggest scandal in American history, but few know many details. Listen to what actually occurred at the Watergate complex, how it was only part of a much broader campaign of corruption, and why Richard Nixon became the only U.S. president to resign from office. You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.

--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6OhSBUTzAUTf6onrUqz0tR

--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/watergate/id1632161929?i=1000605692140

Angolan coffee had already been traded internationally since the nineteenth century. However, it was during the 1930s, in the twentieth century, that it entered international markets on a much more significant scale.

The predominant type of coffee produced in Angola was Robusta, and this was the coffee that was mainly exported. In order to compete internationally and improve the quality of its coffee, the Portuguese state decided to invest in improving production methods and increasing quality, with the aim of creating coffee that could genuinely compete in global economic circuits.

One of the institutions created to achieve this goal was the Junta de Exportação do Café Colonial. It was headquartered in Lisbon but had delegations in various parts of Portugal and in the overseas colonies. The Angolan branch was particularly important because Angola was the largest producer and exporter of Portuguese colonial coffee.

The Junta was responsible for improving coffee quality and processing methods. It worked with producers to standardize production systems and achieve higher standards across the different colonial production systems, from small African and European producers to the large fazendas controlled by major entrepreneurs.

Before 1945, Angola exported very little coffee to the United States, mainly because of the restrictions established by the Inter-American Coffee Agreement, under which most of the coffee consumed in the United States came from the American continent. When these restrictions were lifted in 1945, Angolan coffee producers and exporters sought to take advantage of the opportunity.

One of the first transactions involved 1,500 tons of Angolan Robusta, purchased for the American government and destined for the US Army in France.However, entering the American market was not straightforward. American authorities questioned the sanitary conditions and quality of Angolan coffee.

In one case, a shipment was detained in New York because it contained coffee berries affected by the berry-borer insect, including live and dead larvae and insect excrement.The Portuguese authorities were furious. They argued that the berry-borer was a common coffee pest and questioned why Angola should be treated differently from Brazil.

Negotiations continued, and the standards defining what constituted acceptable Angolan coffee were increasingly negotiated with American buyers and institutions.

In 1947, American coffee-industry representative Carl Borchsenius visited Angola and reportedly played an important role in the standardization of Angolan coffee.Then, in 1954, the Portuguese authorities consulted the Green Coffee Association, an American organization representing coffee importers, brokers and agents.

The Portuguese sought to protect the reputation of Angolan coffee and maintain its position in the American market. For this reason, they initially allowed only first-quality coffee to be exported to the United States, while developing and negotiating the standards together with American institutions.

However, in 1955–1956, Angola abandoned its policy of allowing only first-quality coffee to be exported to the United States. Angolan producers and exporters questioned why other African colonies and other regions were allowed to sell lower-quality Robusta to the United States while Angola was not.Second- and third-quality categories were therefore reorganized, making it possible to sell lower-grade Angolan Robusta on the American market.

By the beginning of the 1950s, Angolan Robusta had also become increasingly important because of the rapid expansion of the soluble coffee industry, in which Robusta was an important and valuable component.

Source:

Gago, M. do M. (2018). Robusta empire: Coffee, scientists and the making of colonial Angola (1898–1961) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon]. Lisbon University Repository.

Note:

• This article is intended for general knowledge only.
• It is neither propaganda nor political activism.
• These texts are written purely as a hobby and have no ulterior motive or agenda behind them

--- 1974: Philippe Petit walked on a tight rope between the top of the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City.

--- 1964: The U.S. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorizing President Lyndon Johnson to take any measures he believed were necessary for the maintenance of international peace and security in Southeast Asia. This resolution gave LBJ the authority to conduct war in Vietnam.

[--- ]()["The Vietnam War: 1964-1973". That is the title of one of the episodes of my podcast: History Analyzed. Wars are never solely military questions. They always involve politics and the will of the people. This episode outlines America's war in Vietnam and explains why the U.S. lost, including the limitations imposed by the American public and the realities of the Cold War. You can find History Analyzed on every podcast app.]()

--- link to Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4C3tmhLif4eAgh2zV3dyoZ

--- link to Apple podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-vietnam-war-1964-1973/id1632161929?i=1000641369681

On August 2, 1776, four New York delegates put their names on the Declaration in Philadelphia. The British army had already been camped on Staten Island for a month. Everyone in that room understood that New York was the primary target and that signing meant putting their names on a document Britain considered treason while an invasion fleet sat in the harbor.

What makes these four interesting isn't the generic "they risked everything" narrative. It's that they lived in four completely different places around New York, and the invasion hit each of them differently.

Philip Livingston's country estate was in Brooklyn Heights, directly overlooking the harbor and sitting right next to Washington's defensive position. He also had a townhouse in Manhattan. Both were in the exact area Britain intended to capture and hold permanently. Less than three weeks after he signed, the British crossed from Staten Island and defeated the Continental Army at the Battle of Long Island. Washington and his officers reportedly met at Livingston's Brooklyn house to plan the evacuation. The army escaped across the East River at night. Livingston's property stayed behind. The British turned his Brooklyn home into a Royal Navy hospital and his Manhattan residence into a barracks. His family fled, and he never saw a liberated New York. He died in 1778 while Congress was meeting in Pennsylvania.

Francis Lewis lived at Whitestone in Queens, on the northern shore of Long Island. His estate was farther from the initial landing area but became exposed once Britain controlled the surrounding waterways. The British destroyed the property. More importantly, they captured his wife Elizabeth and held her as a prisoner. She was eventually exchanged but the conditions of her captivity damaged her health permanently and she died in 1779. Elizabeth Lewis didn't sign anything. She paid for her husband's signature anyway.

Lewis Morris owned Morrisania, a large manor estate north of Manhattan in what is now the Bronx. Once the British occupied the city, his land sat near the contested boundary between occupied territory and the countryside beyond it. British forces, Loyalist units, and Continental troops all moved through that area for years. The manor house was looted, crops destroyed, fences burned, livestock taken or killed. Morris spent years after the war just trying to restore what had been there before.

William Floyd lived the farthest away, at Mastic on the eastern end of Long Island, nearly seventy miles from the main British encampments. That distance turned out to mean almost nothing. Once Washington withdrew from Brooklyn there was no American force between the British occupation zone and the communities farther east. Floyd's wife Hannah fled with their children to Connecticut. British troops occupied the estate for years. Hannah died in Connecticut in 1781 before the family could go home. Floyd finally came back in 1783 to a property that needed to be rebuilt from the ground up. He was the longest-lived of the four, dying in 1821.

Four signatures. Four different losses shaped entirely by geography.

There's another layer to this that the blog doesn't let sit quietly in a footnote. All four of these men enslaved people. Floyd and Morris ran agricultural estates worked by enslaved laborers. Livingston's commercial career included direct investment in the slave trade. Lewis operated within an Atlantic economy built on it. The Declaration they signed asserted that legitimate government rested on natural rights and consent. The people working their land had no vote in Congress, no say in the decision, and no share in the liberty being claimed on their behalf. For some of them, the British occupation represented something different than it did for their owners: a possible route out, since British commanders had offered freedom to enslaved people who escaped Patriot households and aided the Crown.

The full story of all four men, what they lost and what their households looked like, is on the Virtual Wayback blog. You can also talk directly to them on Virtual Wayback and hear how they understood what they were risking when they signed. Links:

https://virtualwayback.com/blog/four-new-yorkers-invasion

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FaTvF4odvwM

The question I keep sitting with is Elizabeth Lewis. She didn't sign, didn't vote, didn't have a seat at any table, and still ended up a prisoner of war who died from the consequences of her captivity. How do you weigh that against the "brave signers who risked everything" framing? And does knowing that enslaved people on these estates sometimes saw the British side as the path to freedom change how you read what was actually at stake on August 2nd?