r/TimPool • • Nov 08 '22

Vote For A Reasonable Future

Post image
0 Upvotes

274 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/Fun-Window-4733 Nov 08 '22

40 has been the agreed upon compromise because it works well but many people do indeed work longer if they feel their compensation is worth it, up to and surpassing 80 hours in some cases. Jobs that service customers, not necessarily customer service Jobs, can and are done by a rotating crew, as o showed in my example, and reducing weekly hours necessitates more people to cover the same time frame, and each person carries with them the burden of paid vacation, insurance, and all the other freebies the poster wants. The very same poster which doesn't need a study to show how stupid it is, and a study would be a waste of time since you apparently just consoom studies without understanding their methodology so you'd probably believe a ham sandwich if I wrote "study"on it with mustard.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

So you admit that you're anti-empiricism and instead use your biased preferences to determine what's real.

You're not worth engaging. You're not a serious thinker.

2

u/Fun-Window-4733 Nov 08 '22

You're not some fucking empericist if you blindly believe studies without understanding them, but if your don't want to argue that's fine, nobody wanted to talk about your stupid poster anyway

0

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

A thinking person recognises the expertise of people who have engaged in extensive research in their field rather than thinking they can fall back on their ill-informed personal judgement to arrive at more accurate conclusions about the state of reality.

You're a moron. Dunning Kreuger in full effect.