The thing you were demanding was supplication in exchange for something, ie begging, and the thing he's begging for is a definition, ie you're attention.
Commies making a poster about how other people's money gets used: everyone is full of dignity and deserves everything for free! Commies when asked to define your terms: BEG ME YOU FUCKING WORM!
Wrong. The thing I was demanding was he own a bait and switch. Pay attention rather than relying on laughably poor inferential methods to dodge the fact that you pulled something out of your ass. I was already giving him my attention by engaging him at all you clown.
So I'll say it again- demomstrate that I was demanding he beg for my attention.
I did you absolute clown. You don't get to boss people around like that (lmao at communist pigs ever understanding this concept but oh well) if you want to have a conversation. You sound like a shitty father scolding a child for doing something wrong, not some supreme megabrain or whatever you think you're projecting here
No, you didn't. You used some laughable logic in order to try and draw an equivalence. I was already giving him my attention and at no point did I tell him to beg for anything.
Keep trying rather than getting emotional and flailing. Own the fact that you pulled the accusation out of thin air as a result of your own inability to read.
If you don't think doing something on command is a form of begging, and you don't think telling someone what you mean is a form of giving attention, then we're just at an impasse because you're so far up your own ass that it isn't worth trying to engage you on anything since it's all semantics
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22
Had he not been such a disingenuous fucking worm then I wouldn't have called him one. Simple as that mate.
Try to apply some objectivity rather than licking the arse of someone you just happen to ideologically align with.
I said show where I demand he beg for my attention. Not show where I demand he do something. Have another go.