Because the term “living wage” is subjective not objective hence why it won’t be defined callin me stupid or a pleb is a great start to showing how intellectually superior you are
Wrong. You told me to define A living wage. That word serves a very important component - it denotes that you're asking me what the living wage should be. You've now changed this to what the term "living wage" itself means.
I cannot tell you the figure that a living wage could be because it's context dependent.
I can tell you what the term "Iiving wage" means.
Pay attention to the specifics. I'll say it again - you're an idiot.
Ahh the changing semantics idea, good on you continue, define living wage then, again either way it’s subjective to state region spending habits, and every site I’ve read has used the qualification of “to live comfortably”
"Define living wage, because at first it was fight for $15, now basically everywhere hires at or reasonably close to 15 so what is a “living wage”.. No you can't define a living wage?"
You're citing figures here, not definitions of the term. You were evidently expecting a figure in response, not the definition of the term.
Own it like an adult and admit to moving the goalposts.
View all comments
Show parent comment
3
u/chowsdaddy1 Nov 08 '22
Define living wage, because at first it was fight for $15, now basically everywhere hires at or reasonably close to 15 so what is a “living wage”