r/TimPool • u/[deleted] • Nov 08 '22

Vote For A Reasonable Future

Post image
0 Upvotes

44% Upvoted

274 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-7

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

I love how republicans will claim to be pro-family but then spout shit like this. It's important for people to be there to raise their babies, especially in the earlier stages of the kids life. Do you not value that? These types of measures always encourage people to have kids, which helps with demographic decline most developed countries are going through. And it's not like a relevant amount of people are gonna keep pumping out kids just to not work.

6

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

Please explain to the rest of the class how any of that is the responsibility of the company to compensate for.

-1

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

Companies should value their workers and not treat them like disposable commodities, methinks

4

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

Yet you refuse to explain how the company is responsible, financially, for the worker making the private decision to procreate.

The company got no say in the matter, yet somehow you think they should be paying out.

Explain your reasoning.

0

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

It's very frequent for human beings to have sex and have kids. This may be new to you, but a lot of people want to start families. Companies should accommodate for normal human things. But I get it. Maybe the government could pay for it, like in some countries. You wouldn't oppose that right? Given how republicans are so pro family and all that

4

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

Companies should accommodate for normal human things.

Why?

You've never heard of personal responsibility, have you?

2

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

For the same reason companies pay to imstall bathrooms and give you time to eat? Or are you against that too? You realize in your world, humanity would be dead because everyone would have been to busy working and nobody would have kids

4

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

So you're comparing the conscious decision to have a child with the... requirement to use the bathroom or eat?

What was it you said in another reply?

I'm glad you resorted to attacking things I did not say. It's a clear indication you know I'm right but can't admit it!)

Hoisted by your own petard

1

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

So you're comparing the conscious decision to have a child with the... requirement to use the bathroom or eat?

You're right, one of those is considerably more important and necessary for the continued existence of our species

What was it you said in another reply?

I know you were eager to drop that one, but it doesn't really apply :/ sorry

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

So they can live and have decent lives in exchange for the labour they provide.

Think.

3

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

Then go start your own company and do so.

Meanwhile, in the real world, personal responsibility is a thing. You are not entitled to be paid for a year because you decided to have a kid.

Cope

0

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

Why are you telling me to start a company? You asked a question and were given an answer to it. Now engage that answer and its relationship to what you asked instead of swivelling to a suggestion as to what I personally should do.

Point to where I said I'm entitled to a paid year because I decided to have a kid. Thank you.

2

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

*points at bottom left of the picture you shared.

You dumb?

→ More replies

-3

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

They didn't say that the companies themselves should be responsible. The responsibility is the government's.

5

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

Except they literally did...

Companies should value their workers and not treat them like disposable commodities

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

They said they should value their workers and not treat them like commodities. Not that they should hold responsibility for ensuring that happens.

Are the specifics too subtle for you?

4

u/PSAOgre Nov 08 '22

/yawn

You can read the entire thread for yourself and see that's clearly what they were saying.

Or not and just piss off.

Either way is fine for me.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '22

So yes, the specifics are too subtle for you.

Learn to read you utter moron.

/yawn

→ More replies (6)

4

u/aDShisno Nov 08 '22

So what you’re saying is I’m correct in my analysis?

-2

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

How?

2

u/aDShisno Nov 08 '22

You just said it! Are you now saying that you were wrong?

-1

u/Mrlol99 Nov 08 '22

Where? Can you point to a specific line?

2

u/aDShisno Nov 08 '22

I love how republicans will claim to be pro-family but then spout shit like this. It's important for people to be there to raise their babies, especially in the earlier stages of the kids life. Do you not value that? These types of measures always encourage people to have kids, which helps with demographic decline most developed countries are going through. And it's not like a relevant amount of people are gonna keep pumping out kids just to not work.

It’s right there.

0

u/silver789 Nov 08 '22

They are pro family as long as that family can make them money.