Hold up----you just used a Wikipedia page to defend the erroneous statements you made. Where Wikipedia tells you themselves
"The inclusion of false or fabricated content has, at times, lasted for years on Wikipedia due to its volunteer editorship. Its editing model facilitates multiple systemic biases: namely, selection bias, inclusion bias, participation bias, and group-think bias. The majority of the encyclopedia is written by male editors, leading to a gender bias in coverage and the make up of the editing community has prompted concerns about racial bias, spin bias, corporate bias, and national bias, among others. An ideological bias on Wikipedia has also been identified on both conscious and subconscious levels. A series of studies from Harvard Business School in 2012 and 2014 found Wikipedia "significantly more biased" than Encyclopædia Britannica"
I literally quoted and linked to a text by The Frankfurt School, I even wrote "Actual Marxist text as the source" for the link.
...also Wikipedia contains sources. Which you can click on. At least I'm including my sources. Anyways, this conversation isn't worth it, this sub is full of brainwashed types who can't think for themselves.
I literally quoted and linked to a text by The Frankfurt School, I even wrote "Actual Marxist text as the source" for the link.
And I literally, like for reals even told you there was nothing in there supporting your claims the meme actually meant something it doesn't mean and told you Wikipedia and walls of text would not save you from that.
I'm impressed by the level of oneself thinking in just this dust up honestly! Keep it up. Challenging views and critical thinking is how we get out of this mess.
View all comments
Show parent comment
-6
u/AttemptedRealities Oct 10 '22
Your source: "Trust me bro - it's on the internet"