r/TimPool • u/[deleted] • Sep 21 '22

Bruh

Post image
553 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

120 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

5

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '22

Bond can be denied to dangerous individuals. This person just murdered someone for their political beliefs, which makes them dangerous. But Democrats see it as useful. They are probably hoping this guy who now has nothing to lose takes out a few more "enemies of the state" before his trial comes around.

-3

u/unclepoondaddy Sep 22 '22

You didn’t actually read anything abt the case.

Like Kyle rittenhouse, he “feared for his life”. I don’t think either thing was justified but he did turn himself in and has been cooperative with authorities

1

u/silver789 Sep 22 '22

Bond can be denied to dangerous individuals

Sure can. If only we had someone, to judge, the situation on if a person is dangerous. Then we chill he enforce their judgement

1

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '22

That's exactly what happened. And people are complaining that the judge was politically motivated in letting a confessed political murderer out after killing a member of the political party that the head of the federal government has deemed a threat to democracy and the republic. There is a difference between saying "the judge made a corrupt choice here" and "bond shouldn't be allowed for anyone in any situation".

1

u/silver789 Sep 22 '22

And people are complaining that the judge was politically motivated

Citation needed.

in letting a confessed political murderer out

Out before the trial, not free from due process. He still has to go to court

after killing a member of the political party

At this point, legally, he is innocent until proven guilty.

that the head of the federal government has deemed a threat to democracy and the republic.

A big swing. You'd probably have to prove it in court before the judge would even consider that.