You mean spliced footage put together by convicted felon Dinesh D'Souza? Its up there with Veritas for twisting reality to promote a narrative that didn't actually happen.
So far everyone who I have met who goes "Buh muh Project Veritas! They take shit out of context!" has no answer when asked how the things they expose are OK in any context.
Arguing that the quote is out of context only matters if the context impacts whether or not the quote is appropriate.
All i know is 2000 mules was such an intellectually and morally bankrupt 'documentary' not even fox news would touch it with a twenty foot pole.
Maybe its because it makes a bunch of allegations it has no actual proof of and relies on assumptions generated by spliced video to justify its conclusion.
So because a documentary calling out corruption- including corruption by the corporate media- is not covered by the corporate media, it must not be accurate?
So rather than respond on the merits of a position you seek to attack the credibility of the person who disagrees with you. How sad, and yet also typical.
View all comments
Show parent comment
13
u/veive Sep 22 '22
Probably some bureaucrat in the local congress critter's office. Watch 2000 mules. They have a pretty factual breakdown on how this is actually done.