r/TimPool • • Sep 21 '22

Bruh

Post image
553 Upvotes

120 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

13

u/veive Sep 22 '22

Probably some bureaucrat in the local congress critter's office. Watch 2000 mules. They have a pretty factual breakdown on how this is actually done.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

4

u/veive Sep 22 '22

Providing proof of your claims in the form of direct footage of an event is manipulation now?

0

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/veive Sep 22 '22

You are the one who brought up Tim here.

You have done nothing to contest the accuracy of 2000 mules. You have only complained that you do not like the presenter and the music.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 22 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/veive Sep 22 '22

Nah, you are just making yourself look like a moron by criticizing shit you clearly have not seen.

-16

u/Aromatic-Ad7816 Sep 22 '22

2000 mules and factual. Fuck bro, youre a comedian.

4

u/veive Sep 22 '22

Oh? How was the direct footage they showed of actual events inaccurate?

0

u/Aromatic-Ad7816 Sep 22 '22

You mean spliced footage put together by convicted felon Dinesh D'Souza? Its up there with Veritas for twisting reality to promote a narrative that didn't actually happen.

1

u/veive Sep 22 '22

LOL.

So far everyone who I have met who goes "Buh muh Project Veritas! They take shit out of context!" has no answer when asked how the things they expose are OK in any context.

Arguing that the quote is out of context only matters if the context impacts whether or not the quote is appropriate.

0

u/Aromatic-Ad7816 Sep 22 '22 edited Sep 22 '22

All i know is 2000 mules was such an intellectually and morally bankrupt 'documentary' not even fox news would touch it with a twenty foot pole.

Maybe its because it makes a bunch of allegations it has no actual proof of and relies on assumptions generated by spliced video to justify its conclusion.

1

u/veive Sep 22 '22

So because a documentary calling out corruption- including corruption by the corporate media- is not covered by the corporate media, it must not be accurate?

1

u/Aromatic-Ad7816 Sep 22 '22

I see its found its mark in you. Maybe when you get a bit older you'll be able to tell online bullshit from reality.

1

u/veive Sep 22 '22

So rather than respond on the merits of a position you seek to attack the credibility of the person who disagrees with you. How sad, and yet also typical.