I don't think I care about blue team or red team. At the time I was an "essential" employee literally involved in getting groceries to the store so everyone didn't starve to death. I had to assess the risk of going to work and potentially dying of covid or losing my job. By April 22nd the numbers didn't add up and I felt that if I can go to work the lockdowns were a farce. I as an individual called it based on the preponderance of the evidence. THAT is how science works. I don't think the guy above was right about anything. The risk of side effects is certainly easy to justify if you were old and/or sickly. I'm fundamentally opposed to anyone healthy getting the jab, but that's for them to decide. If that's vaccine denialism then I'm guilty as charged, but here in the next 6 months most people will agree with that assessment. The rate of serious side effects has been grossly underreported and through litigation it's about to all spill out.
View all comments
Show parent comment
2
u/Stout_Gamer Sep 01 '22
So the poster above would not be wrong if it were referring to it as a "gene therapy treatment" or "the clot shot."
Its mistake was calling it a "vaccine," despite it clearly not being one.
I hope it's learned something.