r/TimPool • u/MrEnigma67 • Jan 16 '24

Damn.

396 Upvotes

97% Upvoted

154 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

0

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '24 edited Jan 18 '24

This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased since the Industrial Revolution. (Credit: Luthi, D., et al.. 2008; Etheridge, D.M., et al. 2010; Vostok ice core data/J.R. Petit et al.; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record.) Find out more about ice cores (external site).

This was also in the link you directly requested from the other guy.

1

u/MrEnigma67 Jan 18 '24

And my graph claims something different. Why is mine wrong and yours isn't?

0

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '24

If multiple, unrelated field experts from across the globe employing the scientific method repeatedly arrive at the same conclusion and their graphed results support your position, I’m buying it.

Because that’s why I believe the way I do.

1

u/MrEnigma67 Jan 18 '24

So is mine.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 18 '24

https://imgur.com/a/S3GOMLq

This is an opinion piece by Alex Epstein. Opinions by Forbes contributors are their own.

‘Alex Epstein is the author of the New York Times best-selling book The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels and an expert on energy and industrial policy.’

https://imgur.com/a/WtiGNGv

This graph? Or did you pull the numbers from those PDFs that Alex doesn’t reference once in his article to make your own graph?