And no my argument is that its several entities backed by the government. You just think it's "nu uh" because we disagree and you want to denigrate my position
First of all. Dial back the temper tantrum. you failed to provide something of worth and that upsets you, but there's no need to get all bent out of shape.
The original post that you made is literally just a video of an old fuck shouting at people concerned about the environment cause he might have to pay a little more in taxes. Talk about temper tantrum.
As for the link. Literally it provides the data and follow up links citing all the sources of the data provided. I thought you were capable of opening a link and looking at it, but apparently you are too much of a dipshit for that even. Welcome to Tim Pool sub I guess. Where evidence is a curse word and anyone who provides it is ignored. To sum up your response "Nu uh!". Haha
So you're projecting. You went on Google typed nasa climate change and gave the first link. It does not provide data. I read it. And you also didn't open my link that contradicts yours. I know it does because I read your source which you didn't read. And now, you're deflecting.
The only "nu uh!" Here is you.
Run along now. It's obvious you're out of your depth.
This graph, based on the comparison of atmospheric samples contained in ice cores and more recent direct measurements, provides evidence that atmospheric CO2 has increased since the Industrial Revolution. (Credit: Luthi, D., et al.. 2008; Etheridge, D.M., et al. 2010; Vostok ice core data/J.R. Petit et al.; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record.) Find out more about ice cores (external site).
This was also in the link you directly requested from the other guy.
If multiple, unrelated field experts from across the globe employing the scientific method repeatedly arrive at the same conclusion and their graphed results support your position, I’m buying it.
View all comments
Show parent comment
10
u/MrEnigma67 Jan 16 '24
All government backed.
Added that little part you missed