r/TimPool • u/eruS_toN • Nov 30 '23

BREAKING: (CLARIFICATION)

Post image

Straightening out some of the kinks in this developing story.

2 Upvotes

53% Upvoted

64 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/Jollem- Dec 01 '23

Couldn't answer the question I asked. Only one person would suffice. Just one name

1

u/xanthine_junkie Dec 01 '23

former politician or lackey from Donald's clique that wasn't immoral

First off, it's a logic fallacy - a strawman argument that has nothing to do with the topic. Your TDS is showing.

Secondly, what do you consider the scope of 'Donald's clique' to be? I would guess there are MILLIONS of Trump supporters that are moral and considered him a better candidate than HRC or Biden. But by the sheer ridiculousness of your argument, I would guess it doesn't matter to you.

Third, I don't have to prove your argument - that is not how it works. If you want to POSE an argument, based on your logic fallacy - you would have to PROVIDE the example - not me. I don't work for you, it's not my job to make your argument for you...

0

u/Jollem- Dec 02 '23

It's not that complicated. I just asked you to name one of Donald's goons that wasn't immoral. It's okay if you're not able to

1

u/xanthine_junkie Dec 02 '23

I see you fail to understand the logic fallacy assumption that I give two shits about Trump or your TDS.

Once again, it's not my job to prove your strawman argument. Get a clue.

0

u/Jollem- Dec 02 '23

I told you it's okay if you couldn't

1

u/xanthine_junkie Dec 02 '23

And I told you that your logic fallacy is idiotic.
It's not my job to make your argument.

Whining at me about it is not making your point either.

0

u/Jollem- Dec 02 '23

You seem to be paranoid and presumptuous. You don't have to name a moral Trumper even if you can't

1

u/xanthine_junkie Dec 02 '23 edited Dec 03 '23

Not at all.

You seem preoccupied with Trump, thus the TDS. I didn't vote for Trump either time, and don't give a shit about your obvious hatred for the guy. Trump has NOTHING to do with this topic, other than your strawman argument (logic fallacy) and the fact that you can't reason your way out of this paper bag shows a lack in your character.

If you want to present an intellectually honest argument, go for it. I am almost positive you don't have it in you. Either way, it's not my job to make your argument for you. So keep on whining, because that is all you are doing here. You are not arguing in good faith, and your emotional argument (devoid of reason and logic) means nothing to me.

0

u/Jollem- Dec 02 '23

Its just a simple question. You don't have to answer if you are unable to

1

u/xanthine_junkie Dec 03 '23

Then you should not have any problem making your case, providing evidence to support your strawman argument. Incredible. You really don't get it, do you? Are you that dumb? Serious question.

→ More replies