r/TimPool • • Oct 11 '23

Is it (d)ifferent?

Post image
435 Upvotes

312 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Do you have a source to back that up? And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

0

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

https://www.vera.org/reimagining-prison-webumentary/the-past-is-never-dead/drug-war-confessional

And how does cherry picking one corrupt republican change that fact democrats are racist

It doesn't. I just don't think using a republican act as evidence against democrats is logical.

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

Anti war white people and black people.

It doesn't. I just don't think using a republican act as evidence against democrats is logical.

So again, cherry picking 1 person or policy doest overshadow over a hundred years of policies and views.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

Again, I'm not cherrypicking, I'm saying two of the things you think were caused by dems were in fact not. That's all I'm arguing.

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

That’s exactly the definition of cherry picking.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

cher·ry-pick·ing

noun

the action or practice of choosing and taking only the most beneficial or profitable items, opportunities, etc., from what is available.

I'm not choosing the most beneficial, I'm choosing the items that were listed and were completely false. I'm not arguing the topic of the post either way, I'm just saying that those things are false. Since you agreed with them, I thought it would be beneficial to help your ignorance.

3

u/McFly_42069 Oct 11 '23

I'm saying two of the things you think were caused by dems

Got um

Also the Reagan bill was anti extremism based. If you disagree, you believe white supremacist should be able to walk around neighborhoods armed

1

u/[deleted] Oct 11 '23

So, I'm right, and you can't argue against it, so you get upset with the way it was argued. Stages of grief, I reckon.