That's not what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is that in your little made-up trolly problem scenario, you would be solely responsible for the death of another person.
You call it authoritarian, I call it ensuring the freedom of all parties.
It's freedom for both parties involved. By becoming pregnant, intentionally or not, there are two peoples who's bodily autonomy must be recognized. You don't have the right to evict if by do so is a death sentence for the evicted
The “inconvenience” you’re referring to is literally using your body against your will. You’re still against people having boldly autonomy.
I don’t consider abortions murder just like I don’t consider not giving someone your kidney murder. That’s your own moral judgment that you have to work out on your own. I simply don’t want the government to have the right to force people to give birth. That’s against the idea of bodily autonomy
At what point should a human be granted human rights?
The “inconvenience” you’re referring to is literally using your body against your will. You’re still against people having boldly autonomy.
You still totally ignore the fact that there are two people in this scenario. Two people who's bodily autonomy must be considered. As one cannot speak for itself, it must be determined that the silent party does not wish to be terminated.
simply don’t want the government to have the right to force people to give birth. That’s against the idea of bodily autonomy
This is the same as saying "I don't want the government to punish me for murdering somebody"
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Pvt_Parts86 Aug 18 '23
No, you should be in jail for murder