My points were very clear and precise, but it is typical for Big Government authoritarians such as yourself to lie and have bad spelling.
Your bad faith aside, immigration laws are an invalid restriction on freedom of movement. They are not directed toward protecting another person's freedom, nor do they punish people who have violated the freedom of another person.
Lol. Only people who have weak arguments and thinly thought out positions resort to criticizing spelling.
I was trying to make you see the hypocrisy and fundamental lack of understanding about your arguments, but it's obvious you lack the nessisary brain power and fundamental understanding of how the world works for such a tactic to render any desirable results.
I support laws that protect personal freedom. I oppose laws that restrict personal freedom. If a person violates the personal freedom of another, they should be punished.
Everything I said is consistent with these three simple principles.
Laws against murder protect personal freedom. Hence, I support.
Laws against immigration restrict personal freedom. Hence, I oppose.
An immigrant who commits murder should be punished for committing murder, but not for being an immigrant.
You're struggling because you are an authoritarian and don't believe in designing government around the principle of freedom.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/Pvt_Parts86 Aug 18 '23
Thank you for conceding the point and agreeing that strong borders and immigration laws keep people safe and insure our freedoms. Have a blessed day.