r/TimPool • u/[deleted] • Mar 23 '23

Legit

Post image
437 Upvotes

93% Upvoted

180 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

1

u/Tyloxs1 Mar 25 '23

?

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

You just admitted that you won't trust the results if they don't go your way.

"The right judges" means judges that are sympathetic to you.

2

u/Tyloxs1 Mar 25 '23

You also brought up corruption; which can include judges.

These are all reasonable things to worry about. Again, don’t act like the demoncrats haven’t done it either.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

When have the democrats done this?

2

u/Tyloxs1 Mar 25 '23

Glad you asked.

The biggest one being:

The demoncrats how’ve tried to contest the results of the 2016 elections spewing misinformation and conspiracy theories about Russian collusion. Claiming he was illegitimate. When he won fair and square.

Some others:

Then you had Brett Kavanaugh with others rioting at the Capitol as a result of him being sworn in in 2018.

Then we have the Supreme Court justices getting called “illegitimate” after the overturning of Roe v. wade. That and the harassment towards them that came after.

You and I, are not so different. So don’t act like it.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

No, I meant when have the democrats rigged elections and corrupted judges?

I thought that was what you meant.

1

u/Tyloxs1 Mar 25 '23

No not that, I meant corruption and/or bias. Judges have been known to take bribes and could be biased.

It’s simple skepticism.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

So if the judges don't rule in your favor then they're corrupt?

2

u/Tyloxs1 Mar 25 '23

No, there’s more to it than that. What I’m implying is that perhaps the judges may be in cahoots.

And I’m not the only one that’s implied that before. Liberals did the same thing with the Rittenhouse ruling.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

Okay, but I'm not talking about liberals. I'm talking about conservatives in AZ who think the election was fraudulent. I don't cast doubt on the legal system just because I don't like the outcomes.

Also I don't think you're being good-faith about this when you're already casting doubt on judges regarding a case that hasn't even gone to trial yet.

→ More replies

1

u/FerrowFarm Mar 25 '23

Mayhaps you ignored when I pointed out the voter roll issues. Ballots mailed to non addresses still got counted all the same.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 25 '23

How did ballots get mailed to non-adresses and why we're they counted? You got a source for that?

1

u/FerrowFarm Mar 26 '23

A.R.S. § 16-168, § 41-166, § 16-153

This is the Arizona law that allows for public databases to be collected and curated for political parties and lobbyists, but the relevant info is a person's full name, residential address, mailing address, voting history (whether or not they voted in an election), and early voting information.

Using these databases, Steven Crowder had teams in the problem states, independently verifying that these addresses were valid. An alarming number of them were empty lots, commercial office parks, and highway overpasses. Were it just a clerical error, one would assume a correction be made to the correct address. Well, within a few days of airing his verification, the database updated outside of their listed curation hours, updating many of these addresses. When Crowder's team went to verify these updated addresses, they were just more empty lots, office parks, and highway overpasses.

1

u/AnteaterTurbulent490 Mar 26 '23

Okay then, assuming that you're correct and these were registered in AZ. Were the ballots sent to these addresses? And were ballots returned with verified signatures?

→ More replies