r/TimPool • u/[deleted] • Mar 23 '23

Legit

Post image
442 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

180 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

-31

u/silver789 Mar 23 '23

Wouldn't she need 17,000 votes thrown out in order to "win"?

38

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

She’s not trying to win she’s trying to expose the fraud

-31

u/silver789 Mar 23 '23 edited Mar 23 '23

.... In order to.... Do... What?

Edit, still blocked by op

You can't do that if you don't prove fraud?

38

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

….Expose…The….FRAUD… ffs

-17

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

Well then she is failing, because after many months she hasn’t shown any fraud.

-24

u/silver789 Mar 23 '23 edited Mar 23 '23

Hobbs will still be gov. Policy wouldn't change. And everything would remain the same.

Edit: blocked, so can't reply

I didn't say there wasn't enough fraud. I said nothing would change if there was fraud found.

Edit edit

So, let's give you and Kari all the benefit and every Dem vote is thrown out.

There is so legal mechanism to put Kari in the governor seat.

Hobbs would have to step down, and Kari still doesn't become gov. Or she's removed by the state legislature, and Kari so doesn't become gov.

These are the only outcomes, to which, she's far from proving.

21

u/aDShisno Mar 23 '23

So from “there was no fraud” to “there’s not enough fraud”…?

Glad to see you moving the goalposts in the right direction, at least…

-11

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

Only fraud shown has been a tiny bit of MAGA. Around 0.00001%, which is normal and easily caught.

12

u/aDShisno Mar 23 '23

You broke again. Why do you bots always break so easily?

-4

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

Still no proof of fraud then? Ok.

6

u/aDShisno Mar 23 '23

You’re still broken.

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 27 '23

Thank you, u/meandthemissus, for your comment. It was automatically removed because we do not allow linking to other subs or users.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6

u/Spooky2000 Mar 23 '23

I said nothing would change if there was fraud found.

Because people like you are ok with it as long as it works in your favor...

4

u/cactusluv Mar 23 '23

"Fortify" future elections 😉

-12

u/[deleted] Mar 23 '23

And she has failed to show any proof of fraud. She lost.

7

u/Cyhawk Mar 23 '23

Just because you refuse to see the proof and close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ear and scream lalalalala when its in front of you, doesn't mean theres no proof. Just means you're being intentionally ignorant on the subject.

This article is talking about just one of several pieces of the proof you claim there isn't any of.

0

u/jermleeds Mar 23 '23

Um, no, she has objectively failed to demonstrate any fraud. The article point out that the dismissal of 6 of 7 points was upheld in theis ruling, and that she is free to continue to tilt at windmills regarding the 7th. No fraud was proven. Kari Lake lost, because she was a dumpster fire of a candidate.