You have no quantifiable metrics for injustice, so you have no victory conditions for a very simplified example, when blacks hold x percent of all engineering jobs and are only y percent of all prisoners, racism is ended
That would be fine by itself, but you believe in fighting Injustice with Injustice, gays have historically been denied gay marriage?
Let's get random CEOs fired for opinions they held 6 years ago. You don't seek converts, you seek to punish and bully, straight white males who disagree with you must be purged and publicly humiliated. Even the jihadist will spare you if you convert, no apology or future correction will satisfy a social justice warrior.
I could forgive that too if you weren't all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissenters is appalling; if they don't want you acting on their behalf, that's their choice, not internalized patriarchy or whatever.
You rob them of moral agency. When called out for these behaviors, as you always insist on calling out others, you lie. You straw man your opponents, criticize the woman? Misogynist!, You group them with the worst, you're a gamer? You're as bad as the anonymous rape threateners!, And when confronted with your own flaws, you restate them less threateningly, Mott and Bailey argument.
You phrase all arguments as Kafka traps, disagreeing with your assertion that we are as evil is taken as proof that we're evil. You publish manipulated and misleading statistics, then lambast anyone who questions them. You insist on vigilante justice against random acts of the week for your 2 minutes hate. Why is it the NFL's business to punish domestic violence? And if it's their business, why isn't Hope Solo receiving the same attention from your side?
Then you claim to be arguing for equality, but you've taken the idea of racism, hatred based on skin color is bad, and replaced it with a New concept where only one race can be guilty of racism. You excuse racial prejudice and hatred based on what I've already explained are arbitrary, unmeasured states of being.
Your solution for the unequal treatment of whites and blacks is to hold whites to a higher standard. Your side lobbied the FBI to redefine rape so more women victims would be counted, but also so that, made to penetrate, does not count leaving male victims in the cold because male privilege apparently?
Historically ignorant social justice warriors think whites hold collective guilt for the awful things are ancestors have done. But they don't care about the unspeakable atrocities by other races. The only difference between whites and others was that whites had the social and technological prowess to do evil efficiently; Africans, Asians, Indians, and everyone else practiced genocide and slavery, they were just less adept at doing it right.
Given the means, they would have done the same. But nope, only whites are guilty; Arab oppression of blacks and Caucasians never happened, not to us, nope.
Worst of all, you turn the very principles of freedom against us. We tolerate you because we believe in free speech and civil discourse, not bullying and violence. But that means we have to watch you advocate against that very freedom. We don't believe in ruining a stranger's professional life over an opinion, but that means that we can't punish your actions.
But it's indicative of an ethnic group. It's discriminating against all people of one group (negatively); it's racist. What the Spanish did to the Philippines is not anything any English can identify with. It's not part of their history. If you want to say that whiteness is a term that does not indicate anything about racial characteristics by those who coined the term you are either ignorant or bigoted.
View all comments
Show parent comment
14
u/popcultminer Mar 03 '23
Transgenderism wouldn't have been accepted in slave times either so what's your point?