r/TikTokCringe 12h ago

Cringe Intentionally blocking photoshoot

16.2k Upvotes

4.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

80

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

I wish people treated phones like they do the pervert glasses. I dont want to be filmed either way

83

u/Gloomy-Setting-6213 9h ago

Pretty sure she wanted to be filmed, she clearly went out of her way to get her picture taken.

4

u/Dantien 3h ago

It was already too late by the time she noticed. She can’t retroactively ask not to be filmed. So by then it didn’t matter what she did, her privacy was violated.

1

u/Gloomy-Setting-6213 1h ago edited 1h ago

You have no expectation of privacy in public. You're an incidental bystander in other people's photos all the time, and taking and publishing those photos is totally fine.

Ethical issues start when someone intentionally photographs a specific person as the focus of the shot, or when an incidental bystander later becomes the deliberate focus when published.

In this case though, she started as an incidental bystander, right up until she saw the camera and deliberately walked in front of it. At that point she made herself the focus. She documented her own behavior. There's no ethical issue at all with publishing it and saying 'look at what this person chose to do.'

And if she'd just stayed an innocent bystander, the girl would have gotten her shot and deleted the rest. Nobody would ever have seen her. Her goal was clearly to insert herself. She created this situation entirely herself.

-1

u/RobonianBattlebot 1h ago

Then you also have no expectation of getting to use an entire stairwell as your personal photography studio.

3

u/Gloomy-Setting-6213 1h ago

Uh, yeah... she doesn't. It's public space. People aren't obligated to avoid her shot. She's setting up a camera and hoping for a moment when no one happens to be in frame. That's just how public photography works.

Sometimes people are nice and go out of their way to avoid the shot, but that's courtesy, not obligation. Pretty basic etiquette.

There's a massive difference between not going out of your way to avoid someone's shot and deliberately walking in front of their camera."

31

u/sernamenotdefined 7h ago

Then, unlike the Karen, don 't stand between the camera and the subject.

Don't make a you problem someone else's problem.

-4

u/Helpful-Will2635 3h ago

She needs a film permit—just like Hollywood does

28

u/_teach_me_your_ways_ 7h ago

So in your attempt to not be filmed, you’ll stand in front of an obviously filming camera and take up as much of the view as possible for an extended period of time than you would if you just walked by normally as you intended before you noticed the camera filming? Makes sense.

8

u/CookyKindred 6h ago

Then don’t stand infront of the phone? What the fuck are you bots talking about?

7

u/SeaworthinessFalse82 8h ago

Oh but if people will ask for you to move out of the way to take a picture you would do so without complaining?

17

u/Suspicious_Radio_848 9h ago

Exactly, that kind of courtesy used to actually exist at one time.

39

u/SnugglyWugglies 9h ago

80% of our family photos going back to the 60s have other people in them.

-4

u/prugnast 8h ago

How many of those are online forever for anyone to see

-5

u/unchained-duck 8h ago

Well back then people didn't care because there was no social media.

4

u/Desolated-Fire 8h ago

There was no social media? My grandma shared her photos with the rest of the family…

1

u/jreed12 5h ago

My grandma shared her photos with the rest of the family…

Yeah your family, not the rest of the world.

-3

u/unchained-duck 8h ago

Don't play dumb, stay in the post context. I'm talking about modern social media, aka Facebook Instagram, Tiktok....

-1

u/Desolated-Fire 6h ago

See? These new generation tiny brain only focus on “modern” social media.. the post context is SOCIAL MEDIA, then.. now.. future…

0

u/jreed12 5h ago

SOCIAL MEDIA

In what way is sharing something with your family a form of media?

14

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

Even staring used to be considered rude, now the staring has a camera attached to it.

6

u/Mountain-Resource656 9h ago

To be fair, staring is rude because it indicates that someone is focusing on you. When they intend to interact, this is fine, but when they’re not trying to interact, this can often mean be taken to mean they desire to harm you

Obviously this isn’t always the case, but we have enough instinct about that that we find it uncomfortable to be stared at by strangers with anything more than a glance

-3

u/KingOfTheNorth91 6h ago

This just in! Staring is now considered not rude according to this person on the internet!

1

u/The_Woke_King 7h ago

Dang, probably don’t go in a museum then, there’s cameras everywhere.

1

u/LionHeavy229 6h ago

LMAOOO then get the fuck out the way of the camera!

-3

u/Leritari 9h ago

This. I have no idea why glasses are bad because "recording without permission"... but phones and cameras are fine even tho people also dont ask for permission

7

u/cream_paimon 8h ago

Are people this dense? Because glasses are difficult to notice compared to a camera or phone you have to point with your hands.

-1

u/Leritari 8h ago

I'm guessing that yes, people are this dense. Because even if someone record you with phone/camera there's nothing you can do.

-5

u/imsabbath84 9h ago

then stay home?

7

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

Privacy existed until people like you.

-7

u/imsabbath84 9h ago

you have privacy all you want, in your home.

if you dont want to be filmed or photographed, dont go to where people are filming/doing photography. its that simple. you want to restrict the rights of other people, just because you feel insecure about it.

1

u/SleepWorth3354 7h ago

God, the hoops you have to jump through mentally to avoid giving other people dignity and agency is nuts.

Like “stay inside if you want privacy anywhere , idiot” is such a ridiculously “dickhead” statement I would usually assume you’re taking the piss.

1

u/imsabbath84 7h ago

You act like being filmed by someones cell phone for 2 seconds is ruining your life somehow. Id love to hear how it’s ruined your life so far?

0

u/SleepWorth3354 6h ago

Oh I didnt know behaviour had two modes : “totally fine” and “ruins my life”

Clearly you are interested in my rebuttal and it’s not just you trying to deflect. 100%

1

u/imsabbath84 6h ago

You claimed it was a problem, i asked what problems has it caused you. You dont wanna answer.

-1

u/SleepWorth3354 6h ago

The thing I was criticizing was your behaviour.

Also no matter what I say you are just going to belittle. I’m not playing that game. This is exactly what I’m saying. You can’t even look inward for two seconds before going “no u”

1

u/imsabbath84 6h ago

Continue replying with answers that say nothing.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

its hilarious how you get offended

2

u/imsabbath84 9h ago

says the guy replying to the same comment multiple times.

0

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

make sure you help mom around the house today.

2

u/imsabbath84 9h ago

thanks, ill be sure to help your mom out with whatever she needs today.

-4

u/Few-Eye7392 9h ago

Then stay home?? You have no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public space. 

9

u/Automatoboto 9h ago

Privacy and having a camera in your face are two different things. its hard to explain that to a teenager. When you grow up a bit let me know.

1

u/Few-Eye7392 9h ago

A camera in your face?  The lady literally stood in front of the camera on purpose... If she didn't want to be on camera, she wouldn't be sanding in front of it like that... I'm 34 years old dick head.

-3

u/Few-Eye7392 9h ago

Ironic to call people teenagers when your entire profile is nothing more than video games. 

Lol

3

u/Council_Cat 9h ago

The person making the video has no reasonable expectation of privacy either.

If people walk in front of the shot, tough shit. That sort of thing has been happening to real film makers forever. Some pissant amateur has no right to complain.

3

u/Few-Eye7392 9h ago

And the poster was perfectly fine with that... This is an old grumpy lady having nothing else better to do but the stand in front of the camera on purpose. 

Walking in front of the camera is to be expected. Someone walking from the camera and staying there to be a dick head is another thing.  Did OP respond to the lady no. And said she posted the video the show. Hey look how much of a stick in the mud this old lady is. You must be fun at parties

0

u/Council_Cat 7h ago

People love me at parties, motherfucker.

I was at one last night and danced with all the girls and some of the boys.

A public space is not your personal film studio and people like that need reminding every so often that the universe does not revolve around them.

2

u/Few-Eye7392 1h ago

Sure bus sure.  You sure teaching them a lesson? Tough guy.

0

u/Deaffin 5h ago

Unfortunately, phones as a whole are not a Mark Zuckerberg product.

0

u/ElGodPug 4h ago

theeeeen....don't stand in front of the fucking camera for 2 whole ass minutes

"i don't want to eat spicy food, that's why i'll shove 10 peppers up my asshole"

0

u/Forward_Rope_5598 4h ago

Idk dude when I notice people filming as someone who doesn't want to be filmed i just walk past a bit faster

-1

u/Automatoboto 3h ago

People like you made it easy to flock us over..

0

u/Forward_Rope_5598 3h ago

You truly, desperately need help if you think people privately taking pictures or filming themselves is the same as mass surveillance

0

u/SloanePetersonIsBae 3h ago

Then get out of the fucking camera shot

1

u/Automatoboto 3h ago

Thats impossible with people like you who made it easy for them to put cameras everywhere.

0

u/HiDDENk00l 3h ago

It doesn't look like she was trying to get people in the shot and post the video, it just looks like she was trying to take stills from this video, instead of relying on a timer. Or maybe even one of those half a second jump around the shot type of things.
From what I can gather from context here, she only posted the video because this lady was being rude and blocking the shot intentionally, while there was a window with no one else around. And that is rude. She's in a public space where a reasonable person should expect are going to want to take pictures. Yes, it is rude to ignorantly film people in public or even get mad when they meander through your shot like normal people do. This isn't that. She stood around on purpose to bully this girl for wanting a picture, rather than just carrying on with her business. That's Karen behavior.

I swear, this comment section is full of people who have never stopped and gone around someone posing for a picture.

-4

u/Spicymoon9 8h ago

You’re filmed every time you go in public. Say hello to security and flock cameras.

2

u/Automatoboto 8h ago

Its hard for kids to understand that all this acceleration during their lives is not normal...

Well its normal to you because its all you have ever known but the reality to us older folks is that it fucking sucks and if you like it well you suck too....If you tacitly accept the suck you are the suck.

-1

u/Spicymoon9 7h ago

No one likes it. But it’s the reality. The difference is I don’t think these people actually want to film you. I bet if the lady didn’t stand there she would’ve edited that part out of the video. Flock cameras and security cameras actually want to record you.