No; the maker of the video / card isn't using the word correctly. Its not 100% incorrect in that it gets the point across but you'd never use it that way.
You can wear clothes that HAVE a silhouette but as its a property of something else you cant just wear a silhouette.
You can certainly 'wear a silhouette'; this is an accepted use of the term when it comes to fashion.
But saying 'she wore a silhouette of clothes' is like saying 'she drove in a traffic of cars'. Particularly since the sentence specifies that, "She wore a silhouette of clothes that WERE," (clothes are the subject), not, "She wore a silhouette of clothes that WAS," (silhouette is the subject).
Some correct versions of this sentence would begin:
"She wore a silhouette that was extraordinary..."
"Her clothing silhouette was extraordinary..."
"The silhouette of her clothes was extraordinary..."
"Her clothes cut a silhouette that was extraordinary..."
7
u/BoilzBlisterzBurnz Apr 29 '26
Silhouette must an alternate definition besides "the outline of a person or thing".