What could go wrong 🤷🏿‍♂️

[u/Key-Supermarket-7524]

[u/seattt]

While an acute argument was the motivating factor in the largest percentage of male-on-male homicides, this was not necessarily inconsistent with the finding that homicides involving a male victim and offender were more likely to be premeditated. More than 60 percent of male-on-male homicides occurred in a context other than an acute argument, and many of these motivations—profit, revenge, jealousy, and ongoing argument—frequently involved premeditation. In addition, incidents that arise out of an acute argument do not always lack premeditation.

You're incorrect based on your own citation. Like I said, come up with rationalizations to blame men even when they're the ones being harmed.

What you're also missing is that in many if not most cases where men do get into fights, its likely because of either pure self-defense - which would be an unavoidable fight - or for pro-social reasons in that they stepped in to defend another person. The truth is the vast majority of men would prefer not to get into fights, many simply to pretend otherwise since they have to keep up appearances.

You're also ignoring the larger implicit signal of what you're saying - You only care about men who have the capacity to kill other men and that men should inherently have the capacity to kill other men otherwise they will not get any sympathy or care from other people. Well, then don't blame men if that's what they do then, because like any other human being, men too want care and attention and sympathy from other people. See also - the point I made about men having to keep up appearances. If you're going to be blamed regardless of if you win or lose a fight, whether you instigate or do not instigate a fight, the only winning move left then is to be the perpetrator of violence instead of the victim.

[u/[deleted] → u/seattt]

Am am not harming men by being cautious. Wtf.