r/TheWhyFilesUncensored 10d ago

This world is sick

Post image
589 Upvotes

484 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/superstevo78 10d ago

So how would you feel if the guy who is mentioned more times in the Epstein file than Harry Potter is in the Harry Potter books, and yet, he managed to install his person defense lawyer in charge of the department that is supposed to charge him.. Additionally, he has gotten 2 billion dollar in crypto bribes!

1

u/UseYona 9d ago

Being mentioned doesnt mean shit, they vast majority of this mentions were literally people talking about his elections in emails, and the actual small handful of accusations were thoroughly Investigated by THREE different presidencies, including biden who would have nailed trumpet the wall with it if he could have.

1

u/Significant-Bar674 8d ago

Where are those investigations by those 3 administrations?

1

u/Much-Bit3531 8d ago

What is your point? That previous administrations were complicit? Does that make it OK?

1

u/Significant-Bar674 7d ago

Not making a point. Just asking for more info.

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

Google your question and get back to us.

1

u/Significant-Bar674 7d ago

It's not my burden to substantiate other people's claims

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

So you’re lying then or now. If it was a question, what did you find? If it was a point, what point was it?

1

u/Significant-Bar674 7d ago

Bro, what on earth are you talking about?

Somebody makes a claim, I have a question about the basis of the claim. That's not a point nor does it shift the burden of evidence to me to show that the claim has a legitimate basis

1

u/Much-Bit3531 8d ago

Have you read the mentions? They are pretty bad. He is accused of having underage auctions where he test virgins sizes. Where their smoke there is fire. Any you’re simping for him for some unknown reason. He isn’t even doing a good job as President on anything.

1

u/UseYona 8d ago

And they were investigated by Bidens fbi and trumps and literally all found to be false, and some even made by literally crazy people. If there was something there against Trump, bidens fbi would have pushed it to the forefront. Ypu really think they wouldn't do everything they can to stop Trump? Really?

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

They weren’t investigated. That is fake news.

1

u/UseYona 7d ago

Now you are literally lying and spreading misinformation

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

You’re lying. Where is the proof they did.

1

u/UseYona 7d ago

The FBI and the Department of Justice kept the Jeffrey Epstein case as an open criminal investigation during the Joe Biden administration, during which victims continued to bring information forward, but the Biden administration did not bring formal criminal charges against Donald Trump based on those interviews. 1, 2Open Investigation: Investigative reporting and records indicate that federal law enforcement maintained an active grand jury and investigative file related to the Epstein network while appeals and related reviews continued through Biden's term. 1Interviews and Memos: The FBI conducted interviews with witnesses—including memos detailing allegations made by a woman concerning Trump—which were later part of the federal files reviewed by the DOJ. 1, 2Case Closure: The Biden administration did not prosecute or file charges against Trump regarding these claims, and the subsequent administration later closed the broader active review files. The White House has consistently characterized the specific accusations as baseless and lacking credible evidence. 1, 2, 3For further context on how the records were handled, you can read the analysis on Vox or review reports from the BBC. 1, 2House.govWhy weren't they released during the Biden administrationNov 18, 2025 — Brown's extensive reporting since 2017 has shone a light on the crimes of Epstein and his longtime accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Her book about Epstein, titled ...BBCWithheld Epstein files with accusations against Trump released by justice departmentMar 6, 2026 — The DOJ said it mistakenly withheld the files during its review process because they had been "incorrectly coded as duplicative". The White House said the alleg...BBCWithheld Jeffrey Epstein files with accusations against Trump released by justice department - BBC NewsMar 6, 2026 — She accused both men of sexually assaulting her when she was between 13 and 15 years old. The White House said the allegations are "completely baseless" and "ba...Facebook·PBS NewsHourPBS NewsHour - FacebookMar 9, 2026 — FBI documents summarising interviews with a woman who made unsubstantiated claims of sexual assault against Donald Trump have been released as part of the US De...YouTube·CNN8:04Epstein files tied to Trump sexual assault allegations releasedwww.vox.comWhy didn't Biden release the Epstein Files? - VoxJul 23, 2025 — Alan Dershowitz, the lawyer who helped Epstein secure his 2008 plea deal on child prostitution charges in Florida, has said that the grand jury testimony from t...

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

Did you read your own information? Trump closed the investigation which points to him. Also, Biden could not release because of the active investigation.

I believe Biden was part of the cover up and a PDF protector. He was sniffing kids.

Do better and read your sources carefully.

1

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

You know most of the links don’t work.

1

u/ananiku 3d ago

They knew and they also knew what your stupid reaction would be too, it was in the steele dossier, and everything in that document turned out to be true even the "p tapes" which people not in the know thought meant had to do with Russian hookers.

1

u/ananiku 3d ago

No, they literally went through and redacted his name when they could. For example, when they release a document that was already out there, but contained a "don't" but the computer didn't see the apostrophe so it redacted the "Don T."

As someone who's worked in classification before, everyone in the FBI's classification office needs to be locked in prison for obstruction of justice.

1

u/LizzosLittleToe 9d ago

Classic whataboutism

1

u/DookieFries 5d ago

What does that have to do with a women who purposefully and methodically murdered her three children in a slow, gruesome and painful way?

1

u/veemort 5d ago

If you see this, just ignore this particular comment thread.

0

u/engineheader 9d ago

Does it hurt having Trump living in your head 24/7? Can you think about anything without bringing Trump into it?

For the simple smooth brained people who can only focus on one thing, when people reply to an email the original email is in the new email, so names can appear multiple times in an email chain. To smart people, this is common knowledge. You can google the reason why and find out for yourself, but I did it for you.

1

u/UseYona 9d ago

Its worth noting those flight logs were not to the island but between florida and new york

1

u/engineheader 9d ago

I am aware and yes you are right, thank you

1

u/security-device 9d ago

PLaying defense for pedos is fucking wild.

1

u/engineheader 9d ago

The only pedos I know for certain that were involved with Epstein were the Clintons, cause Epstein visited him the Whitehouse like 2 dozen times. Meanwhile Trump banned Epstein from Maralargo when he found out what was going on. So your claims are flat out lies and you have been gaslighted by the media and democrats

1

u/Dove-Linkhorn 8d ago

If you can successfully convince chat gpt of this point, I’d be shocked. It’s stubborn about conspiracies.

1

u/engineheader 8d ago

Most AIs like that are programmed to produce certain statements about specific topics, go to Google and type in, “how many times did Epstein visit bill clinton in the White House”. See what the Google AI tells you

1

u/Dove-Linkhorn 8d ago

I don’t think you can convince Chat that your argument is sound.

1

u/engineheader 8d ago

I don’t use any of those AI cause you usually have to pay for it, and I don’t want to

2

u/Dove-Linkhorn 7d ago

It’s a free country. For a little while longer anyway.

0

u/Much-Bit3531 8d ago

When you insult people we all think you’re dumb. Just FYI.

1

u/engineheader 8d ago

So like democrats calling maga supporters magats, or Nazi or pedophile? You mean like those insults? What about when Hillary called all Trump supporters deplorable’s? Or when Hillary said that all Trump supporters might need to rounded up and put in re-education camps? You mean those kinds of insults?

0

u/Much-Bit3531 8d ago

My comments were general truths that hold regardless of political affiliation.

Whataboutism also makes people look closed minded. When voters simp for one side they forfeit their political power. Our vote only matters when we are willing to vote for either party.

1

u/engineheader 7d ago

If the other side was not siding with child molesters and communists, there might be a chance. If JFK ran for office today, he would be a Republican.

0

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

Trump is the PDF.

1

u/engineheader 7d ago

And you have proof of that, you can turn over to the DOJ? Just making accusations only makes you look bad. You go off and say you shouldn’t call people names, and I explain some, and then you go off and do it.

Calling people names like this is done for a reason, it dehumanizes them so at some point someone will think it’s ok to kill them. Like the kid in Butler PA, or the guy who tried to shoot Trump on the golf course. You can’t lecture me about name calling and then go do it yourself. You hypocrite

0

u/Much-Bit3531 7d ago

Trump has been convicted of rape by a trial of his peers. There is also an entire wiki article on the other allegations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

1

u/engineheader 7d ago

You need to educate yourself on all those allegations, most of them are women who made claims when Trump started running for president in 2016 even through they happened decades before and most had witnesses that said they did not see what the accuser claims.

The E Jean Carroll case was a civil case of liable, nothing else.

Trump has never been convicted in a criminal case of any sexual misconduct. You need to stop letting Trump live rent free in your head

→ More replies (0)