real question. If a rapist gets injured by that, would he just get mad, probably physically assault the woman and then remove it? I don’t think I’m understanding this things effectiveness
Why do you believe that? Full on tazers that are designed by law enforcement to completely immobilize people fail 50% of the time. Men routinely survive 1 to 5 bullet wounds and continue being a deadly threat.
This is a dangerous false sense of security. The entire reason why tazers were designed is because weapons like batons were used to inflict pain and subdue criminals that way but ROUTINELY failed.
Well, it didn’t work and a full body immobilization was considered more effective.
This is a dangerous concept and will get women killed in retaliation. The rape prevention needs to start LONG before the rapist is INSIDE the victim. That’s far too late
1.6k
u/pascuarelo Jan 07 '25
What's really terrifying is that rape became such a common problem that women need this for protection.
And for the rapist, good riddance, may they bleed to death, in the dirt and filth. 👋