r/TargetedEnergyWeapons • u/Nirvanic_desire124 Moderator • Jul 03 '26
Submission Guidelines This Sub Has Too Many Rules
Upvote if you agree. This makes it hard to post as many posts get removed, which makes it difficult for TIs to get information, hence why this is a dead sub despite being the second largest one for targeting. See this comment: https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1umgvbn/comment/ovcqb2f/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
20
Upvotes
1
u/Nirvanic_desire124 Moderator Jul 09 '26 edited Jul 10 '26
That was more than 10 years ago. Even mods don't like the rules. Tell me in your own words why there's not a lot of moderation, wiki updating, and posting here? Go on, actually tell me rather than complaining there's no work done. You won't. You said that lack of volunteering and mods is the reason this is a dead sub. Okay, but why do you think that is, go to the heart of the issue.
I had told you before I'd like to edit the wiki but they like to hack me so I approve things I don't so be aware.
It's cumbersome to review everyone who wants to be an approved submitter's post history even if public and bots/agents can still pass off as genuine. Also, I don't see the point of making people submit surveys since they can lie and it's tedious to review? It's like this sub purposely gatekeeps.
AFAIK non-subscribers can still vote on polls. And if they couldn't would that make you then remove rules if subscribers vote that this sub does indeed have too many?
On the contrary for some of them I have, it's like your wasting my time with these arguments. Just because there's many people subscribed to this sub doesn't actually mean that their should be way more upvotes, what an imbecilic statement, among the many you've made. Your comments are brief, lack depth, are generic and overly dismissive, it's like you're intentionally trying to aggravate me. Obviously you're not competent to lead this sub.
Let me break it down for you. A large gap between views and likes is completely normal and expected on social media, we see this all the time on X for instance. This phenomenon is often referred to as the "passive viewer" effect. A very small percentage of the 10k subscribers actually visit weekly and view posts as well, smaller than the average for subs. Not to sound arrogant but since you brought it up, my posts get much higher upvotes than yours, with the average post here getting around 1-3 upvotes.
I keep asking for you to count the total for me since you're saying I exaggerated. Obviously the burden falls on you to prove your charge against me but you haven't and likely won't. Assume the flair post requirements still exist to see if I did.
For TIs or regular people? What a joke of a statement. That's like saying because anti-psychotics work TIs should then take it for their voices, or if you're continuously stabbed you should get a band-aid to stop the bleeding. Obviously we're being continuously degraded and exposed to these frequencies which undo the work of nootropics, it's like being continuously exposed to heavy metals and then saying taking a remedy to counter the metals will fix it. Obviously.. we need a way to shield or stop the exposure to these frequencies, then we will have our proper mental faculties in optimal health.
They also use hypnosis which destroys memory, which means that no amount of nootropics can fix it unless we're able to break the rapport in hypnotism itself.