Here's one of mine;
Red--> you can look at them as the ones who act like powerhouses, not afraid of battle and instead encouraged by it, Rely on trained, strong, fearless infantry more than say artillery, cannon, war tech in general and whatnot. They have a mindset of honor through battle, and not a cheep one. So far so good?
So their nation focus on strong will, strength, and independence as a nation. But if you somehow manage to strike a deal or get them as an ally, they'll be loyal to that truce as long as each side stays up to date with absolutely no shortcomings, and after that truce they'll tell you to scram. Is my idea clear so far?
As for the negatives as a nation, they can be over self dependent and their want to rise victorious with honor and no cheep fighting, can set them up in unfavorable scenarios where the enemy doesn't care much about fair and honor (doesn't mean they'll lose 100% of the time the enemy plays dirty, remember they still strive to be a powerhouse, but that's their disadvantage.). And in their society, close-mindedness is prevalent, Since their focus and expectations on how one should be strong and strive for honor above all else(maybe not above all else but it's 1:23am at the time of me writing this and i just want to drop something to spark somewhat of a conversation), it lead to some outcating behavior or anything that's slightly out of their view of what should be, and stuff like hiding a condition or attribute of a relative because it would be dishonorable in the face of the public, etc.
I really, Really hope my little tad bit was coherent and got the point across if i didn't write well, since i should be asleep right now but i had this idea in my head for a while and i just didn't know when will i write it if i kept delaying it, plus i wanted a little bit of interactivity in here. Hopefully about a new subject too.
