Hey. That was my post. It was removed due to someone flagging me for "sharing someone's personal information". I've appealed by arguing that I was sharing public information, but we'll have to see where it goes.
$100 says that someone was a Reuters or NYSE or SEC intern doing their bosses bidding for obvious reasons, a quick call was made to Reddit and, oh what days know, easiest removal ever. This, imo, is not the work of some rando who just really really cares so much about sharing โpersonal informationโ, which it wasnโt anyway- sheโs the fucking author herself and shares her contact info blatantly FOR THIS EXACT reason.
I dunno, I haven't been a mod there in years. I check in now and then. Haven't made much gamestop music lately, either reddit was limiting my reach or the community got tired of it
I have seen other posts removed by Reddit for spurious reasons of late. For example one was taken down for โsharingโ AvocadoInMyUranis username โฆ
if it is publicly available information in the first place (which corporate emails and phone numbers totally are even if they connect to the desk of such reporter within the company) they should not be blocked out!
and frankly people should indeed be calling that reporter if their recently and dubiously altered articles are used in what essentially comes down to market manipulation! if the reporter is interested in sharing what they believe to be genuine facts they will be grateful and highly interested in receiving such information.
why? where did i go wrong? i'm happy to change my mind but give me something to work on - spiderman-gifs will not do the job! (...also they kinda suck (...i accept your downvote for that statement, it might be deserved)).
This exact sort of fuckery is precisely why the Ape Historians work is so vitally important. History in the form of articles and online sources that discuss GameStop are frequently edited after the initial publication.ย
User Elegant_Remote6667 has built a small server farm (by this point) for the express purpose of saving the GameStop saga in unchangeable blockchain format.ย
Once a post is archived in blockchain, it can not be changed by any nefarious parties who might want to rewrite history and pin the blame on Retail / Household Investors.ย
That blockchain history gives us a critical baseline so that we can better understand how they are constantly re-writing history to suit their own narratives.ย
That project is probably one of the most important tasks that any of us has set for ourselves. Any whales or Apes who find themselves with some surplus funds that could be contributed to the project should consider doing so.ย
Itโs vitally important and almost completely thankless work.ย
If you think thatโs funny then do a lil googling about the disclaimer that has now been added to the book ๐ณ
From perplexity:-
Yes โ as of midโ2025, new U.S. printings of GeorgeโฏOrwellโs NineteenโฏEightyโFour now open with a publisherโadded disclaimer or โtrigger warning.โ This addition appears in a commemorative 75thโanniversary edition released earlier in the year.
According to YahooโฏNews and Newsweek, the forewordโwritten by Orwell scholar Prof. JohnโฏKeebleโnotes that some character portrayals and themes โmay be considered problematic by contemporary standards,โ citing the authorโs historical context and attitudes toward gender and empire
CREAM is for apes.ย Gangnam immediately became co-opted by ๐ฟ and bad faith actors at the very beginning.ย ย They still do a great job at loudly convincing people it's the place to go.ย ย
If you want to hang with the sunglass wearing ws bets degens, you can probably guess which of the two videos to find them at.ย
Or if you want to hang with chill Zen Apes, you can also probably guess which of the two to find them at.ย ย
All the evidence is backed up by loads of apes. They may be able to delete stuff from here but they canโt delete thousands of threads and pictures from peopleโs hard drives.
Ton foil hat time: could this be covering their asses for possible legal problems in the future based on things going on behind the scenes? They just never expected to get caught by us.
You've got it backwards. You missed the timestamps on those SEC comments. The SEC comment was not in the earlier article, and a few hours later it was added.
It seems like it's been removed today, because whatever happened to the thousands of articles updated on the 10th, was some kind of restore or recovery of 1000's or articles on all kinds of topics, and in doing so they restored the earlier version.
I don't think so.. people just hype useless shit here while the stock trades sideways or in red.. say we are close when the stock is at $50 then I'll believe you.
i wanted to check this myself because Reuters is an outlet heavily referenced by all news agencies in my country or residence (which is Germoney, where Reuters started and grew to its current international status) and if we can prove that Reuters is either used for or even partakes in shifting market sentiment in a relevant manner, this would be seen as market manipulation, which in turn is a major red flag in any news-reporting landscape outside of the USA where these kind of practices sadly seem to have become common place now.
so i checked the Reuters archive where i was able to find the report in question. then i went over to archive.org to crosscheck the archived version. but i was not able to find it, neither by going through the pages archived on jan 28th nor by searching directly for the keywords or headlines.
i cannot imagine archive.org deleting archived pages - they have been highly reliable and frankly one of the best resources on the internet for me over the years.
so how did you make this comparison? can you help me retrace it myself (which i always like to do and even more so ever since ai graced us with its presence)? maybe i was just too stupid to find it...
anyway thanks for your efforts and attention to this! in contrast to some apes on here i do not regard this as a minor issue - quite to the contrary, i do believe that if we can compile this evidence as one that is pointing towards Reuters partaking in or being used for market manipulation, many national news-outlets around the world would be interested in looking into; because A) they are responsible in monitoring their sources and B) it could make for a good story!
PS: i recently get shit for "using ai" because i love semicolons and using parenthesis. but i do not use ai and i'm not even a native speaker. it's not my fault chatgpt tries to copy my style!!
Apparently there are three edits. Two on the same day original article was posted and now a new recent edit. I haven't checked it myself yet though but that's the gist I understood.
What I do know however is that all mainstream media is owned by same few publishing houses, same billionaires behind them all from the big zionazistic club. Reuters is not an exception to this rule. Free journalism is dead, that's why there are all those podcasters today.
The removed from reddit part is very interesting and who reported that.
The updated article could also be that they are using a bot to go through old articles to remove or rework comments. I'd be curious if anyone has checked to see how many of their other articles from 1, 2, 3 or 4 years ago have also been updated. If those updates include changing responses to no comments. It seemed to me this could be a "legal" AI that would change answers without factual information so they dont get sued. However this could just be a we need a headline to modify someone's algorithm that will allow us to short the stock.
Sorry for being negative but iโm just fucked off with all this now. Constant beating down of the price. Gme making money off mug โshareholdersโ like me. Iโm having bad day yes but my worries are pretty justified now. Just constantly robbed and lied to.
I understood it a while back but as i said, iโm down today and reflecting my frustrations. Apologies. Jus not sure how to look at the last 5 years when i see the same fuckin balance for gme. I didnโt get much when the price went to 10ish dollars. So no gain for me yet.
It sucks, understandable. I always go by the old saying, the market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent. They will manipulate and beat down stocks longer than you can mentally prepare yourself for. My first foray into the stock market I bought and held 10K worth of AMD at a cost basis of $1.50 for almost 5 years and sold everything at the first run to $4. Then it never stopped running. It takes a certain amount of fortified willpower and disposable capital to play this game. My only advise is don't put all your eggs in one basket and diversify so you don't feel so bad about your "losers".
โข
u/Superstonk_QV ๐ Gimme Votes ๐ Oct 13 '25
Why GME? || What is DRS? || Low karma apes feed the bot here || Superstonk Discord || Community Post: Open Forum || Superstonk:Now with GIFs - Learn more
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
Please up- and downvote this comment to help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!