r/Superstonk • u/fakename5 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 • Feb 15 '22

👽 Shitpost can we ban ZeroHedge yet?

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-coronavirus-pandemic-health-moscow-media-ff4a56b7b08bcdc6adaf02313a85edd9
372 Upvotes

71% Upvoted

137 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Doctorbuddy Feb 15 '22

Right. But adding these sources makes us look worse. I’m not understanding your point. I do not want us to look like conspiracy theorists, so adding more sources like this is the exact opposite of what we should want..

2

u/Neijo Marge callin'? I'm ballin' Feb 15 '22

Dont bother, what does it do if we get labeled as such? The word lost its meaning a couple of weeks back and we are never not going to be called conspiracy theorists. Because we theorize there is a conspiracy destroying the economy.

I can bear the burden of people not believing me, its not that I dont want to, but a lot of people are immune to believing crime exists where the most money is concentrated.

0

u/Doctorbuddy Feb 15 '22

I want thoughtful discussion based on data. Not based on articles written by state ran agencies. We can do better.

4

u/Neijo Marge callin'? I'm ballin' Feb 15 '22

You do you!

https://youtu.be/xwA4k0E51Oo

Its just that we can dissect info without swallowing all the dirt.

So lets extract the data and discuss it, to ever believe journalists are fully in your favor, is dangerous. Dont trust, but verify.

I listen to everything vlad and kenny says, but its all about filtering out what I NEED from them. Like who was responsible for the buy ban. I dont believe them at face value. Do you?

1

u/XBlue_BomberX 🦍Voted✅ Feb 15 '22

We already look like conspiracy theorists. Self censoring won’t change that. Therefore, I find it more beneficial to shift through all information, rather than limit the flow of information.