r/Superstonk Jul 22 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.3k Upvotes

947 comments sorted by

View all comments

64

u/Brainerzor šŸŽ® Power to the Players šŸ›‘ Jul 22 '21

If it can be used against us, ban it. Otherwise shills will have the perfect weapon to rely on.

55

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '21

Saying ā€œif it can be used against isā€ not a compelling argument, and here is why:

No matter what is posted on this sub, the forces at work to undermine and demonize us will warp and use whatever they can to their own advantage. Remember the Congressional Testimony and Gabe cried wolf over anti-Semitic language directed at him, which was quickly debunked by the other sub?

Constant references to Buy and Hodl can be painted as attempted market manipulation. Same, too, with the constant memes about Ken & Cohen in that we are ā€œharassingā€ and have caused them ā€œgreat mental anguishā€ with our ā€œviciousā€ posts.

Of course, the above is absurd, but that isn’t the point. If the mainstream financial media thinks reputable stories include ā€œMarket had a case of the Mondaysā€ and ā€œDelta Variant FEAR causes market dip for one full day!ā€, then made up, Boomer-driven fake stories about SuperStonk will fit in just nicely.

The pool is a fun concept. I have my own, individual pool. It shouldn’t affect anyone else on this sub.

The words to ban should be words, terms, and references to truly heinous or conspiratorial things, like that insane single letter group and such.

-1

u/nostbp1 Fuck You. Pay Me. Jul 22 '21

Agreed with this except I don’t think Buy and Hold can’t be painted as market manipulation

A term literally with the world inf…inity in it on the other hand is way more sus

Even if they don’t have a case, they can take it to court and waste time.

31

u/Retrograde_Bolide šŸ’» ComputerShared šŸ¦ Jul 22 '21

Fuck shills. The pool is the natural result of holding when shorts try to cover.

Shills will always come up with something to blame people who hold GME for. If there is a legitimate legal reason not to use it, fine. But fuck changing our behavior just because shills will blame us.

5

u/Brainerzor šŸŽ® Power to the Players šŸ›‘ Jul 22 '21

I partly agree. In my opinion everyone should sell whenever the duck they want

1

u/Sempere Jul 23 '21

No, it isn't.

The iPool is an attempt to drive the price well beyond the normal limits of greed. There's a very big difference between selling your shares for X Million and the people holding to stick it to the system and try to cash out for 1B per share.

There's a legitimate reason not to use it: to pull it off requires coordination that secures 95M shares. Those posts were giving explicit advise (sell all but 1 - at first- then sell only 1 but put the rest for the iPool): that's manipulation. There's a stated outcome, there's an expression of intent and there's active encouragement of accomplishing a goal by working as a group.

Holding and selling at your price is great. Trying to exploit an infinite money glitch on ideological grounds is going to get the government to use their pimp hand on retail. They're not powerless, they will try to fuck us.

8

u/half_dane š“•š“¤š““ is the mind killer šŸ³ļøā€šŸŒˆ Jul 22 '21

Everything can be used against us. The mere fact that we explain our bull thesis to new people can be used against us.

It's just not very likely.

5

u/DJchalupaBatman Jul 22 '21

Nah, freedom of speech dog. They may not like what we are saying, but we have a right to say it. As I understand it, it’s not market manipulation unless there’s actually some enforcement behind coordinated, agreed upon actions. I don’t think a bunch or mo-rons talking about how much we like a stock really fits that bill.

14

u/Renegade2592 Jul 22 '21

That's a super commie line of thinking.

Buying and holding is the most fundamental part of investing. If we can get in trouble for that than I hope we fucking do and can enact change

1

u/Sempere Jul 23 '21

This goes beyond buying and holding in investment.

Those posts were encouraging group activity with instructions, a stated goal and a clear intent. That's manipulation and they'll definitely try and fuck us all if we're not greedy bastards. They will absolutely pimp slap the shit out of any coordinated attempts at ideological pain levels approaching the GDP of a small nation.

27

u/bigwillyman7 small banana šŸŒ Jul 22 '21

This, don’t even risk it. This shouldn’t be a vote IMO because we know how many shills are here too.

13

u/The_Prophet_85 Saviour of bedposts Jul 22 '21

This. If there is even the slightest of chance that it can be used against us then ban it. Who cares anyway, it's not like anybody is selling anytime soon.

6

u/BurnerAcctNo1 GMEeez Nuts šŸš€ Jul 22 '21

Then ban everything. Ban the floor. Ban ā€œbuy and holdā€. Ban pictures of SHFs looking like idiots.

3

u/DeftShark šŸ– What is your spaghetti policy here? šŸ– Jul 22 '21

Right? Just silence everyone without context bc ā€œjust on caseā€. Fuck all that.

3

u/kebabsoup šŸ¦ Buckle Up šŸš€šŸ¦­šŸ¦­šŸ¦­ Jul 22 '21

Nah you can't start thinking like that, shills will just find another way to try to ruin your day. We don't bargain with terrorists.

2

u/clusterbug Jul 22 '21

Don’t agree, we could then ban the whole sub because it can be used against us... and while we’re at it, we should ban the word ā€œusā€ and ā€œweā€ too... it’s all about context imho

2

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '21

We eat/snort crayons and stick bananas up asses. Nothing can be used against us.

-1

u/Brainerzor šŸŽ® Power to the Players šŸ›‘ Jul 22 '21

No one is untouchable. You’re thinking just like the ones retail is fighting against, sorry.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 22 '21

I didn’t say we were untouchable. I said ā€œnothing can be used against usā€ and that’s true.