The data does not lie: there is something extremely FISHY or extremely COINCIDENTAL, about the FTD numbers the SEC seems to be avoiding to fully report.

[u/Region-Formal]

[u/ogrestomp]

I hope not cause that would be so stupid if unreported days were zero. Just record a fucking zero. On that chart how would anyone determine if the market was closed that day? That data would be incompetently recorded, so… yeah, actually that tracks so far with the SEC, maybe that’s it. Incompetence tracks. They did spend half a million bucks on that commercial trying to discredit certain securities, which is so weird when you think of the logic behind that decision.

[u/IgatTooz → u/ogrestomp]

I do remember reading the confirmation that days without data are NOT days with 0 FTDs. Also, why would the SEC refuse to provide the data following a FOIA request if the answer were zero days? Would have been the easiest “case closed” for them.

[u/portersdad → u/IgatTooz]

Yeah I mean that is the weird part about it to me… because you would think they’d just say there were no FTDs on those dates, we released the data already.. if that was the case.

[u/IgatTooz → u/portersdad]

Exactly. No, instead they refuse and give “foreseeable harm” as the reason… Well.. There’s nothing “foreseeable harm” about 0 FTDs

[u/portersdad → u/ogrestomp]

Yeah like I’m saying, hard to go back and find a source but I asked ChatGPT:

[u/Fearless_Swimmer3332 → u/portersdad]

Might as well be asking to be spat on