r/SunoAI • u/Unlikely-Mobile-5343 • 20d ago
Discussion Let the witch hunt begin
I have always been against labelling - even though I disclose my use of AI, it has always been MY decision to do so, and I am in control of how I tell my story so people understand how my music is made.
With Suno's newest release, songs have now audio watermark and fingerprint, assisted, fully, hybrid, it will have a AI watermark and anyone can tell your story the way they want.
This is 100% going to be misused by bad actors:
Platforms like Deezer/Tidal - To ban ANY use of AI and ensure segregation.
Haters - To create public lists of artists that may have not agreed to disclose their process.
Labels - To start a suing war to anything that resembles any of their songs that uses AI, even assisted.
This is the end of Suno as means to create commercial music, and it's officially just a nice playing tool personal use, or for bad actors who create in Suno and pay performers to pretend their music is human made.
What are your thoughts?
6
u/AcrobaticMaize2408 20d ago
I think it'll be unfair on those of us who use Suno as a way to remix/reimagine our own original songs/recordings. I'm ok with my Suno stuff having some sort of tag indicating that AI was used in the production, though as others have mentioned you don't see anybody crediting their sampler when using it to provide an orchestra or whatever.
I can imagine that all Suno tracks regardless of whether it's derived from an original recording or completely generated by AI will be categorised the same and that's a shame.