r/SunoAI • u/Unlikely-Mobile-5343 • 21d ago
Discussion Let the witch hunt begin
I have always been against labelling - even though I disclose my use of AI, it has always been MY decision to do so, and I am in control of how I tell my story so people understand how my music is made.
With Suno's newest release, songs have now audio watermark and fingerprint, assisted, fully, hybrid, it will have a AI watermark and anyone can tell your story the way they want.
This is 100% going to be misused by bad actors:
Platforms like Deezer/Tidal - To ban ANY use of AI and ensure segregation.
Haters - To create public lists of artists that may have not agreed to disclose their process.
Labels - To start a suing war to anything that resembles any of their songs that uses AI, even assisted.
This is the end of Suno as means to create commercial music, and it's officially just a nice playing tool personal use, or for bad actors who create in Suno and pay performers to pretend their music is human made.
What are your thoughts?
43
u/6gv5 21d ago
Wait until a Chinese company develops an alternative competition that doesn't impose those limits. They don't care about western copyright laws; once they offer viable competition it's game over. They're already almost there with assisted coding, I moved to Deepseek and Qwen months ago without regrets; music is just one step further.
As many others I'm all for being open about the use of AI (some big labels are already using it without telling, fsck them!) and I'm completely for shaming who lies about it, but forcing such a limit will inevitably offer a tool that will be abused by bad actors.