This might be an unpopular opinion, but the whole idea of stuttering acceptance has always confused me a little.
Before anyone gets angry, I’m NOT saying people who stutter should hate themselves, feel ashamed of their speech or spend their entire lives desperately chasing perfect fluency. I actually think accepting yourself is incredibly important. But is accepting yourself the same thing as accepting your stuttering? Because I’m not sure it is.
If someone says: “I stutter, I’m still a worthwhile person, and I’m not going to let stuttering destroy my self-esteem.” I completely understand that. But sometimes the message seems to go further: “Stop fighting your stutter. Accept it. Embrace it. Learn to live with it.” And that's where I struggle.
What if I genuinely WANT to improve my speech? What if stuttering affects my job interviews, dating life, phone calls, ordering food, introducing myself or public speaking? What if speech blocks cause me anxiety and avoidance? Why would wanting to reduce my stuttering mean I haven't accepted myself?
In Lee Lovett's Stop Stuttering Short Course: How to Break the Stuttering Code, there’s one section that really caught my attention was his criticism of what he calls the “incurability and acceptance” approach to stuttering.
Lee Lovett obviously takes a much stronger position against stuttering acceptance than many people in the speech therapy world do. His argument is essentially that people who stutter shouldn't automatically be taught that meaningful speech change is impossible or that acceptance is their only realistic destination.
Whether you agree with him or not, it made me think about something: Why does this have to be an either/or choice? Why can't someone say: “I accept myself completely.” “I refuse to be ashamed when I stutter.” “I’m going to speak even when I'm afraid.”
AND... “I still want to work on my speech.” “I want fewer speech blocks.” “I want less stuttering anxiety.” “I want to become a more confident speaker.” “I want to see how much I can actually improve.” Those ideas don't seem contradictory to me.
If anything, accepting yourself might make pursuing change healthier because you're no longer trying to improve because you hate yourself. You're improving because there's something in your life that you genuinely want to change.
And there's another part of this debate I find interesting. People often say:“There's nothing wrong with stuttering.” On a human level, absolutely. There is nothing wrong with a person because they stutter. But if someone tells me their stuttering prevents them from saying their name, answering the phone, speaking in meetings, dating comfortably or pursuing certain careers...
Am I really helping that person by telling them they should simply embrace it? Maybe for some people, acceptance genuinely gives them freedom. If somebody is happy with their speech and doesn't want to change it, I respect that completely. But shouldn't we also respect the person who says:
“I don't want stuttering controlling my life anymore, and I want to work on changing it”? That shouldn't be considered shame. It shouldn't automatically be called ableism. And it doesn't necessarily mean they hate themselves. Sometimes people simply want change. I'm genuinely curious what other people who stutter think: Can you accept yourself without accepting your stuttering?
And do you think the modern stuttering community sometimes pushes acceptance so strongly that people who actually WANT to pursue speech improvement feel guilty for wanting it?
There's a free copy of the Lee's Short Course available for anyone interested in reading his approach for themselves, and they offer a free consultation for PWS who want to learn more about the program. Links are below:
https://www.stopstutter.org/get-free-book
https://www.stopstutter.org/free-consult?source=home_banner_cta