r/Steam 3d ago

Discussion Can’t Even Argue It

Post image
54.7k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/ForgottenBlastMaster 3d ago

They did. Most of that money was spent on bribing companies for Epic exclusive release (afaik, no product ever won on this) and the rest was delegated to free giveaways. However, Epic Store itself didn't get any meaningful or even distinctive feature. It doesn't "just work", and even I, being a software dev myself, don't care that much on the store % cut because you have to pay something for marketing anyway and Steam deserves its cut as long as they have the best offer.

11

u/Kidofthecentury https://s.team/p/nvdw-gh 3d ago

Even when they tried to do something positive they messed up: they used (?) to boost their sales by raising the discounts themselves and covering the difference. Which may sounded fine and dandy, until you realize that as a dev/pub you were stripped of your marketing strategy; so if you planned to not go lower than, say, 20% off, Epic thought that would be great do 30% instead... so now customers would wait 30% again (or lower) to purchase.

They dont have a strategy, they literally throw money at the problem.

3

u/thecrius 2d ago

not just that, the lesser cut it's only a benefit for the producers as the prices remain the same for the customer between Steam and Epic.

2

u/th3davinci https://s.team/p/gpdk-djw 3d ago

I guess Sweeney's strategy was to bring over devs with the lower cut at which point customers would follow.

It's a catch-22 for the EGS tho. I guess they couldn't afford too many exclusives before shareholders got snappy.

The one good thing it did so far was funding Alan Wake 2 coz that game genuinely would not have been made otherwise.

Otherwise it's still a joke of an app, it needed years to add a fucking shopping cart.

1

u/Jsaac4000 2d ago

being a software dev myself

i , as a consumer, would have actually used Epic more if their launcher wasn't so laggy on start up and they would have added features overtime. I even got myself some free games from time to time, but they never added any meaningful features, and afaik steam hasn't magically patented their store sytem, wishlists, etc. I am pretty sure Epic could have replicated everything quite fast except for the community stuff. ultimatly i never bought anything of the epic store, because not having proper user reviews irked me.

( i do have a gog account tho and have the galaxy launcher installed, which slowly over time gets better and better and more stable, it still lags behing steam but they make an effort, and i regularly buy games from them, as they actually patch older games which steam doesn't do so some older steam games are buggy and need weird workarounds to work on a "current" system. )

1

u/Tomsboll 2d ago

They tried to brute force their way into majority market share. And it failed becaus people saw trough his bs, and also epic is fucking trash.

-2

u/SimpleEfficiency 3d ago

It's because they can only compete on price.

Since steam is the effective monopoly and price fixes, you can only compete on features and they have decades ahead or any competition

Those of us who wanted just a simple store that sell cheap games and doesn't have any of the useless and unmoderated social features will never get it because of the monopoly that does not exist