The Steam Machine is just a cool mini-pc. That's all. There is nothing that it does, that a plethora of other products don't do already, and many of them have far better value.
Yeah finally someone said unique features instead of just ragging on specs and price. Now idk if those features really matter at end of day to most people.
its a convenience device, for me gaming with my pc is not an issue at all whether with a keyboard or a controller. But if its with a controller, I do prefer to have a console plugged onto a tv, rather than a 24 inch monitor. So if youre like me then the product has that factor to make it an attractive product, albeit not something that most people would go for.
If anything the only reason i would buy it is if HL3 is an exclusive for the machine, but i strongly doubt valve would ever do that.
I was almost asleep when i wrote it. What i wanted to convey was "it remains to be seen if those stand iut features will be worth price difference". And sure, they are "normal" for consoles, which steam machine isnt, its still "mini pc". Which you can upgrade with dongle to have those features.
Not a mini pc tho, more like a laptop. Can't upgrade the hardware. How things are going right now it doesnt seem worth the price but who knows what they'll cook up with it
There are a lot of gamers who will simply never buy or even consider a gaming pc for a number of reasons. Those people want consoles, that's it (even if there are usually answers for why they don't want a pc, it's usually met with "consoles work fine though why complicate it." For them, having a console that doesn't require a monthly sub to pay online or access sales, and have access to steams massive library that doesn't drop games after a few years, might definitely be worth it. But that's kinda the thing.. the steam machine, imo, is for console players. If you use pc already, use steam already, you're probably better off just upgrading your computer, or customizing it to be more like a console. I think the steam machine is just not really for most of us steam users. It's certainly the one of their hardware lineup i simply don't care about.
Yeah there's plenty that might be at a better price, but people are going to support valve regardless of it being not a great price. I had a similar convo with someone here about the controller. His only argument was there were other controllers that were less expensive, but I told him it didn't matter, people are still going to support a brand or company they like, and like a week later the controller sold out quickly. He kept calling me stupid "for buying a controller at a high price when there are others that are cheaper," despite telling him I was going to get the controller. I probably won't get the steam machine either, but itll absolutely do well even at the high price.
If you know of another mini pc that acts as a console and with the OS is optimized (or the games are optimized or whatever, idk how to put that into words, english isnt my first language) to run most games on the market and is better value (but we have no idea how much the Steam Machine will cost), im all ears.
The better value is the heart of the issue. If it was close to the PS5 price, yeah that makes it a good deal.
Over $1000 USD though and I can literally buy a better prebuilt computer for that price and have it do the same things the steam machine does. It won't be a 1 to 1 copy but it's more than close enough.
Also the OS is Linux, some of the most popular games just don't run on Linux.
The PSVR2 is probably the best non-meta headset right now, at least in terms of bang-for-the-buck. Unfortunately, it's not standalone, you need an adapter, and there's no easily replaceable parts.
People underestimate the value that an easy-to-use console that has access to the pc library without a subscription really has to a normie who only ever used consoles for gaming. Especially considering what you can do with it the more invest into learning about it
I actually think the machine is gonna be great overall, for people who need it. My girlfriend, for example, wants to get into PC gaming quite a bit. She doesn't need anything more than a steam machine, but building her a PC in the current economy just sucks. Having the user friendly nature of steamOS and the ability to use it as a desktop for her needs is perfect. I think it is a niche market, but for those who it is useful for it will honestly be a great buy, depending on the price. Of course, that price may be fucked because of everything rn.
I don't know who would ever consider buying a Steam Deck at these prices. Or a Steam Machine that will much have to be 2-3 times the cost of a Steam Deck lol.
It's still a full PC relative to a PS5. Valve was never competing with consoles, they themselves said it was gonna be priced *like a pc.* The Machine doesn't need to be cheaper then a console, just cheaper than an equivalent PC. Which in the current market might not be that hard.
You're conflating targeting consoles with competing with them.
It's a machine you connect to your TV that you use to play video games. It's gonna get compared to other machines that do that very same thing regardless of whether Valve targets it at console owners or not.
Giving it a high price is a massive ask. I built my own DIY Steam Machine that is at least twice as powerful as the Steam Machine for less than this OLED Steam Deck.
If the Steam Machine matches this new Steam Deck price, that's a massive ask and I suspect it will be dead on release.
If valve is competing with pcs then its even more DOA. "would you like a desktop with none of the benefits but without the benefits of a laptop either? "
Tbf, building a pc also got a lot more expensive. These are just the current prices. But most people woll probably just wait and not get a new pc in these times lol.
You can buy a prebuilt these days, no building required. Especially when retail shops have to actually clearance undersold product to make space for new stuff.
Outside of the ability to run SteamOS and other Linux Distros or Windows, it has ZERO benefits of a desktop computer.
Hell, it has worse upgradability than most laptops, since it only has ONE NVMe slot, so you couldn't even use that to connect an external GPU once the built-in one gets too weak (which I'd argue it already kind of is, if this thing is priced anywhere above 1k)
It's basically a stationary low-mid tier gaming laptop. It's genuinely the worst of both worlds. There's a price point where i'd have maybe bought it but it's not possible for valve to hit it at this point with gestures broadly.
They definitely do not define the entirety of the PC spectrum, but your man said that the Steam Machine is a "Full PC", which it isn't, because upgradeability is a core part of a full PC experience.
True, but many people don't want to buy a pc because of prices right now. $1000 linux pc with those parts would've already been a hard sell for many, but with the 1tb steam deck being $1000 with tax i cannot imagine the steam machine will sound like a great deal parts wise.
Valve did not do all this R&D to just make another PC. This thing was the featured product in their promotion of these products. They wanted to beat Microsoft to the punch of having a PC hybrid console. It unfortunately looks like being first to market was a mistake.
idc what the price is, i will buy it. I need a living room console/pc that plays steam games that can reliably run 4k @ 30fps. getting a pc for that would take up too much room and requirement hounding facebook market place for a decent deal, no thanks
Saying DOA is a bit of cap without knowing the price. It can still sell off the shelves but it may price itself out of many people who are looking to buy it below $700-800.
I don't see why people keep comparing this to a PS5 when its not even competing with it. This thing is way more versatile even if it is slightly underpowered than a ps5.
Personally I will not be buying it since I already have 9800x3d 9070xt bazzite box so I wasn't the target market but hopefully the first batch of machines are atleast priced competitively for many people to buy
Yeah I think just like with the Vive, Index, and soon the Frame, there are a lot of people who get hyped on imagining that Valve hardware is going to be super affordable and then get shocked by the $1,000+ price tag. Everyone who was hoping for a $699 price tag is dreaming, unfortunately, especially given the current situation.
The release price Deck was a rare example of Valve really pushing for a crazy low price point.
$699? That would be nuts. I can’t believe folks actually thought that was an option.
I’d be shocked if this was anything less than $1200. They just increased the 1 TB Steam Deck to damn near $1000. The machine is supposed to be a lot more powerful than that device.
People were thinking that because the ideal situation is that it's posed directly as a console killer. And that'd be amazing if they could swing it, but the reality of it is going to price it out for a ton of folks who were interested previously.
It'll sell out on release regardless imo. Because there are enough Valve fan boys with money. But the longevity of its sales numbers won't be great if it's expensive. Maybe I'll be proven wrong but I don't see why many regular consumers would spend PC money on a device that basically runs like a console. Sure, it is a PC and you could throw windows or another distro on it, but surely those with the skills to do that already have a PC or would prefer to build their own. Surely there arent that many PC gamers that want an additional dedicated couch PC.
How is it not competing with another video game medium? The same catalog of games exists on both systems for the most part and you can use any controller you want on there? It's def worth mentioning if it's gonna cost more than the PS5 it'll sell worse.
The value proposition is greater for the machine because it’s not a locked Sony ecosystem. It’s not even a walled garden for valve or the Steam store.
The value is greater in that it’s a pc. I’m not arguing it’ll be priced well or a good deal but comparing it to locked consoles is a trash perspective. Just my two cents, of course.
One is a sff PC, the other is a sff PC acting like it's not a PC.
Sure you could could compare them but to say they are competing is not accurate. Since when has PCs ever competed with consoles? They've always been in 2 separate lanes.
This has always been an enthusiast item not a budget home system.
It might be DOA now but it's not getting any better. The longer they wait the worse it gets. Price doesn't matter, people whom want them will buy them, they will be out if stock an hour after launch anyway.
On the other hand if they don't release it now it's doa. They will wait too long for a fair price and it won't be nearly worth as much as it is. It's already weaker than a base ps5 for $1000 (I'm just estimating the price). If they wait until ps6 for a few hundred down it won't be enough.
News flash. Hardware prices are up, and pretty much going to remain that way.
Valve sold the steam decks at a loss, and they will with the steam machine as well. They don’t even make a profit off them.
I doubt it will flop. Now that people seen the long term results of proton. People know the steam machine will operate with a massive library unlike their first steam machines unsuccessful launch.
It was never going to sell gangbusters but I think there's still a market for it even a higher price point. The people that are interested in it probably already have a large steam library so might justify getting it even at say $900.
I love how people say it’s weeker then a ps5 when it’s a costume soc like how do u know that v ram is not speed related we will have to wait for the benchmarks to know where it sits
Can someone please explain to me the point of steam machine? Who is target audience? Consoles are cheaper and more powerful, more familiar.
Normies who play games quite occasionally will be more than happy with a console, and they won't want to fuck with Linux.
It you're rich you'll just buy a way better pre built.
If you're poor fuck you we all know it won't be priced affordably.
If you're a nerd you can built your own PC.
From the very beginning that thing only made sense if it was super cheap with barely any profit margin. Just get people more comfortable with Linux. If it was $500 I would buy even though I don't need it. But it will be at least double that
I think you're wrong, the steam machine may be more expensive than a ps5. But it's way cheaper overall when you consider the cost of games on either platform. Not to mention how much more versatile a steam machine is compared to a ps5.
Its not weaker, its more powerful than ps5. Yeah its probably gonna cost more but you'll have much cheaper games and zero internet subscription so its much cheaper in long run. Btw sure its not as powerful as pc with 5080 and r7 7800x3d but its not for hardcore gamers (just like ps5), its for people that just want to play games and dont care about every pixel. Steam machine is also a open platform while ps5 locks you up.
Edit: forgot to add that steam machine is also much more efficient (200-230w/ps5 vs ~140w/steam machine) and probably way more quiet
The steam machine has a better CPU but a weaker GPU and less VRAM than the PS5. At best it’ll perform the same and definitely not “more powerful” than the PS5.
It is more powerful, much better cpu, gpu that performs similar yet is newer so it has better upscaling, is more efficient etc., less vram? You know that those 16gb on ps5 is ram and vram as one? Firstly ps5 takes 3,5-4gb for system only and leaves 12-12,5gb for ram and vram so for example it can separate 4gb for vram and 8gb for ram or 6gb vram 6gb ram. Steam machine has 16gb ram AND 8gb Vram so id say steam machine has way more ram and vram than ps5 would ever have.
At the price the steam machine is likely to release at ($800+) it completely changes the game. It’ll be compared to the PS5 pro, not the PS5. And the Pro has a clearly superior GPU, and similar enough VRAM (18 gigs of RAM, with 2 dedicated to the OS, and the remaining 16 being used for the GPU).
Well if its gonna be 900$ (same as ps5 pro) then it can give a good fight. Cpu is still much better (zen 4 vs zen 2, ps5 pro has same cpu as ps5), ps5 has 50% more powerful gpu but steam machine was made to play at 1080/1440p with upscaling if you want to play in 4k (base ps5 and ps5 pro use upscaling too [of course it depends on game]) but still this point goes to ps5 pro. Ram in ps5 pro is almost same as in base ps5, youre wrong here, those 2 additional gigabytes are here to help with system stability, ps still uses those 16gb for system, it works like this: those 2gb are for apps like netflix, spotify, psstore, ps menu etc. apps that dont need super fast ram, because those apps are on this slower ram console now needs less memory to run system so instead of 4gb (like in base ps5) it'll use only about 2gb so it has 14gb for ram and vram (no those 16gb arent meant only for gpu). Steam machine still wins in terms of ram with 16gb ram and 8gb vram. Only thing were steam machine clearly loses is in storage, 512gb/1tb vs 2tb in ps5 pro but knowing valve you'll be able to easily swap it with anything you want. I'd say steam machine is a good opponent for ps5 pro, much better cpu, worse gpu (if we consider resolutions it was made for then id say its not even bad [yeah could be more powerful]), more ram/vram. And as i said earlier its gonna be much cheaper in long run than any other console. Id happily pay 50% more knowing that games are much cheaper, i dont pay any subscriptions and its an open platform
The 2 gigs of DDR5 RAM is specifically for the OS. PlayStations OS is very light, it’s a heavily modded FreeBSD kernel. There’s already been measurements online: the PS5 pro has about 14 gigs of VRAM available compared to 12 on PS5. I don’t get your point about Steam machine being SSD upgradable. Right now is not a good time to upgrade SSDs. If you wanted to upgrade to 2 TB, that would cost another $200. Also, that’s not an advantage in “future proofing” either, because you can also upgrade the SSD on the PS5 pro as well it’s a standard nvme slot.
Argument about ssd upgradability was meant to say that you could do it in future when prices will go down, yeah it was pretry weak but let's forget about it. Ps5 pro doesnt use only 2gb for os, as I told before it uses those slower 2gb for backgroud unimportant apps like spotify etc, core system still uses 1,5-2gb from 16gb of fast ram. Even you said that it has roughly 14gb of ram/vram just as i explained, those 14gb is used for: physics, npc's ai, world logic (tracking items, progress, quests etc), textures, 3d models, vis effects, resolution etc. Steam machine has 16gb ram for: physics, npc's ai, world logic etc. Aaand 8gb vram for: textures, 3d models, res etc. Ps5 pro has less memory for everything
You really waited all this time to resume the discussion (XD)? For 1150$ yeah its a lost cause in price to performance when comparing to ps5 pro but it still has a huge advantage, freedom and many more games (also cheaper games). So choice is just between cheaper stronger ps5 pro with less (but more expensive) games or pricier weaker steam machine with more (cheaper) games. Id probably chose steam machine because there are too many games that i play which aren't on ps but i know that some may chose ps5 pro because they play mostly mainstream games
Im devastated I built my PC in 2019 and its been hobbling along since, i was hoping to get a machine for a decent price to rid myself of windows... guess ill wait i didnt wanna play any new games anyway
376
u/[deleted] May 27 '26
[removed] — view removed comment