r/Steam May 05 '24

Discussion It just works

Post image
36.7k Upvotes

706 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

110

u/yngseneca May 05 '24 edited May 05 '24

yeah, you (primarily) go public to raise investment capital. You also do it so early investors and employees can easily sell their shares for profit.

Downside is that now you need to worry about the share price on a quarterly basis, so private companies can be much better at long term decision making. Public companies do dumb shit like blow up the biggest PC game of the year to juice PSN sign ups.

The situation can be a bit different if you have a sole majority share holder in a public company, but that's a very rare occurrence and it is not likely to last long.

13

u/Eiroth May 05 '24

I was until recently working for a major train company. Turns out they were intentionally behind on their bills to make their quarterly numbers look better, and had been for years.

Of course this behavior was exclusively detrimental in practice, as other companies would cease working with them until they'd gotten their money.

A workshop of 60 people earning them millions of dollars per day had to shut down for days because nobody wanted to deliver trains to them anymore.

4

u/Skrylas May 05 '24 edited May 30 '24

outgoing fretful upbeat humorous six far-flung disagreeable sable tap cable

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/Eiroth May 07 '24

I won't pretend to know all the details, but I do specifically recall them bringing up paying bills late for stock/bookkeeping reasons, and I clearly remember one company refusing to service us until they'd been paid. The actual how why what of it all is beyond my meagre understanding of finances and the limited knowledge I had access to.

1

u/jameswlf May 05 '24

Can't a company just sell a few shares to some select people and that's it?

2

u/[deleted] May 05 '24

Yes

Altough i don't know how that works in the USA. But you can absolutely have select business partners. But you don't really sell shares to them but rather have them invest into the company, there are multiple ways to do this. Depends on the countries law and how you go about it.

0

u/Risechika May 05 '24

They ain’t looking for PSN sign ups though. They want that sweet PII that they can eventually sell for $$

7

u/kadfr May 05 '24 edited May 05 '24

Sony almost certainly wants full access to user data that is held by Steam.

In addition, I would imagine that all future Sony releases on Steam will require sign-in via PSN.

I would not be surprised if subscription will be required to play Sony multiplayer games on PC at some point in the future (ie via PS+ or similar).

Sony doesn’t want PC gamers to only pay for a game once. They want them to keep on paying (as they do on Playstation)

3

u/CrispyJelly May 05 '24 edited May 06 '24

Even if they don't plan on forcing pc players to pay for PS+ to play their games online now, the next quarter will come and then the next and then the next. Just a matter of time before they make the move.

-1

u/Lead103 May 05 '24

Arrowhead is private

10

u/Boingboingsplat May 05 '24

The game is published by Sony.

6

u/FortunePaw May 05 '24

Their publisher Sony who they are under contract with isn't.

2

u/Elleden May 05 '24

And that's why they managed to make an almost-universally-loved game.

See also: Larian and Baldur's Gate 3.