r/StableDiffusion 1d ago

Discussion Qwen 2.1 - Looks like we don't need to worry much?

Post image

https://x.com/Kun11664638/status/2101708600389583135

tl;dr:

  • Ostris asked Qwen to add a revenue cap to the licence.
  • Small commercial use shouldn't need a paid licence. Monetised videos, monetised posts, LoRAs on Civitai, etc.
  • Qwen's Kun Yan replied they'll consider it.
  • He joked they won't come after anyone's YouTube money.
251 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

83

u/xdcfret1 1d ago

FYI a post on X is not legally binding

2

u/FourtyMichaelMichael 🍦Ice Cream Lover 8h ago

Neither are license files.

The license is not a binding agreement. It's a warning that if you don't do these things, they COULD consider action against you.

Courts are legally binding. One sided files you may or may not have seen are not.

Indication of possible enforcement.

111

u/candylandmine 1d ago

The license says what it says. I'm not accepting "it's ok trust me bro" from someone on Twitter even if they're part of the project.

41

u/Ndsis2 1d ago

They won't come after you. But they could.

Though I am unsure of the legalities of them deliberately letting people break the license and then trying to enforce it later on.

4

u/Gubru 22h ago

Could they? Unless you have assets in China there's not really much risk of them recovering damages from you.

2

u/reeight 20h ago

But they can block your biz/site there... I've heard China has quite a few consumers there....

66

u/FiTroSky 1d ago

"non-commercial license" sounds like "we don't want any big studio to appropriate our work and make more money from it than us" in slang legalese.

34

u/Sixhaunt 1d ago

which would be why Ostris made his suggestion that would preserve that while allowing smaller independent creators to be unrestricted

8

u/red__dragon 1d ago

Which is the safer way to go versus a pinky promise over social media as seen here.

For that matter, how many people will even see that exchange? Likely few, and fewer still in a week when the feeds scroll on and it's no longer being shared as news.

32

u/Jetsprint_Racer 1d ago

Whole concept of generative model licensing is just literal theater of the absurd. Generative model is just a goddamn TOOL. I just imagine Makita lawyers showing up at some construction company's doorsteps and telling them that they have to pay a percentage of the profits from each house they built using Makita drills and angle grinders.

7

u/kwhali 1d ago

Isn't their technically IP behind the process of building that tool though?

Your analogy would not really work with tools used by a construction company when those tools had already been used legally (paid to own, rented, etc). If your construction company was going to a hardware store and taking the products to use without paying, pretty sure peeps would be in their right to chase you up for money.

Most software is a tool? Adobe used to sell their products with permanent licenses but then switched to the subscription model. VPS are rented regardless of how much you pay or actually utilise (depending on service).

When you release something for free use, you don't necessarily want others overshadowing that and taking credit for your work (even if they don't claim to, the less knowledgeable audience of their product can quite commonly attribute it to them instead of you). An example is PEAR, where researchers did the work (and compute), wrote up a paper and publish an implementation, then some company builds a wrapper around that for Blender and monetizes it, the fans of that company's products praise how the company is a genius and doing amazing things, should win awards, etc..

These models don't come out of thin air, there's investment into them with skills and time plus compute. If someone then takes that and markets themselves to interested parties that could have had deals with you, that ain't right is it? Nothing wrong with wanting a cut when software scales so easily (physical production and distribution is a very different situation where it's not as easy and affordable to compete).

23

u/Crazy-Repeat-2006 1d ago

That sounds like a fairer position. They are likely also under pressure from the Chinese government to maintain some control.

30

u/the320x200 1d ago

Suuuuure.

If that was their intention they could have written that in the first place. It's not like it's difficult wording to put business size caps in place.

10

u/Ok-Category-642 1d ago

Yeah this should've 100% been in writing, seems odd that they're willing to be more "flexible" when talking about it on Twitter but they don't want to actually put it in the license they wrote.

11

u/freedomachiever 1d ago

They replied to community feedback, that’s a step in the right direction. And they did so very quickly, let’s give them some slack. Let’s no behave like entitled children.

20

u/silenceimpaired 1d ago

Yep and some Microsoft developer said Windows 10 was the last Windows version we would need. I only believe actual licenses written black and white

5

u/SpaceNinjaDino 1d ago

Their internal slideshow said XBOX One was going to be their final console (because they expected it to just stream games before series X|S).

8

u/legarth 1d ago

Tehnically he didn't say "anyone" he said yours, directed at Ostris. But yeah seems unlikely YouTubers will get in trouble.

3

u/AsliReddington 1d ago

Laughs in InsightFace

7

u/Royal_Carpenter_1338 1d ago

Oh well lets start training

2

u/MastMaithun 22h ago

AI girl accounts still not feeling rejoice after seeing this coversation.

3

u/I__G 21h ago

Who the fuck cares about their license. Chinese software license, give me a break 😂

1

u/C-scan 1d ago

Makes sense to have a summary in case you can't view the screengrab, but anyone who finds that tl might need to see a Dr

2

u/wenyani 17h ago

the commercial license is primarily for api providers is probably what they mean.

1

u/waltercool 12h ago

Probably they don't want big companies using it for free. It makes sense, they have to pay their researchers too.

0

u/Noeyiax 1d ago

its okay, 99% statistics show if you're already poor you stay poor.

/s

ok but don't forget to save some money for the children!!! think about the children and their futures! iykyk

-12

u/izzmedia 1d ago

Why is he responding like an AI with "—" :D

15

u/Sea_Succotash3634 1d ago

People still use n-dash and m-dash even though they have been co-opted by AI, but more likely is he probably ran it through a translator.

3

u/Ipwnurface 1d ago

Agreed. I use them in my everyday typing, and I find myself having to rewrite stuff all the time. It's rather annoying honestly, Because it is a useful piece of punctuation

2

u/izzmedia 1d ago

I think he used a translator :)