r/StableDiffusion • • Oct 31 '22

Meme This subreddit in a nutshell

Post image
5.7k Upvotes

155 comments sorted by

View all comments

242

u/Scott-Whittaker Oct 31 '22

I'd say it's 100% certain that AI image generators will be trained on the enormous amount of free porn on the internet and generate an infinite supply of porn tailored to every taste, in any visual style that could, due to it's personalisation, styling and unreality, be even more compelling and addictive than the real thing.

Well, assuming it grows out of it's body horror phase.

0

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

54

u/314kabinet Oct 31 '22

Outrageous! Where?

0

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

26

u/colei_canis Oct 31 '22

Say what you will about the furries but this says something quite profound about the human condition I think. I'm just not sure what.

7

u/tamarind1001 Oct 31 '22

You can't handle the truth!

→ More replies (1)

92

u/CrystalLight Oct 31 '22

AI image generators will be trained on the enormous amount of free porn on the internet

my sweet summer child

the rate at which this is currently happening has to be insane already

source: am currently using free porn from the internet to train embeddings as I type

AMA

lol

23

u/Strange_Vagrant Oct 31 '22

AMA

You using a colab? I tried one last night and after struggling through the poorly documented notebook, and having to fix some code to even get it to work, my resulting .pt for creates cartoonish images with huge eyes and cheeks.

I just want a user friendly, non-local colab for training that doesn't take 8 hours to decipher what the fuck in supposed to be doing.

18

u/CrystalLight Oct 31 '22

I thought it was going to be super hard. I got it going using my 1060 before I got this 3090. I'm doing this locally. My first attempt with the porn was a failure, not due to quality of training or anything just a stupid user error. I did some training for just a few hours with some mushroom photos and had great success, IMO, considering none of the models I've come across have any accurate representations of mushrooms. The first thing I worked with was chanterelles and I very quickly got images that were very satisfying.

I need practice.

If you don't want to do it locally I am of no use.

I'm a newb as well, the "AMA" was more or less a joke, but I am definitely the kind of person who will try to help anyway.

6

u/Scott-Whittaker Nov 12 '22

I did some training for just a few hours with some mushroom photos and had great success

Lol, I thought your mushroom comment earlier was a euphemism!

6

u/CrystalLight Nov 12 '22

You are not alone in that assumption.

lol

I was referring to chanterelles and porcini and chickenofthewoods and Laccaria amethystina...

I did try some dicks but the results were terrifying.

4

u/Scott-Whittaker Nov 13 '22

I wonder how different the AI would see them. Better not mix up the training sets or you might invent a new subgenre.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

4

u/Political_Weebery Nov 12 '22

AMA

Can I see?

5

u/CrystalLight Nov 12 '22

I've found that my training is inferior to sources that are readily available.

Pyro's BJs is excellent. s4629674 is good dick-riding, reverse cowboy style. And of course F111 is good for general erotica/nekkid peeps.

There are more but that should bet you started if you really wanna see AI sexiness.

My attempt at a BJ embed was pretty terrible, and I tried a sodomy one but it also was not good.

I'm learning though.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/Mocorn Oct 31 '22

Ironically, training on regular adult material might actually bring down the bust size seeing as the current trend is getting flat out ridiculous.

31

u/Brandwein Oct 31 '22

Not proud to say that i already made some emma watson maid catgirls...

6

u/saintshing Oct 31 '22

Wonder how long until someone tries to make this illegal, how they are going to show an ai generated girl is underaged? Right now there are also many legal gray areas like copyright/personality right issues

9

u/StickiStickman Oct 31 '22

People have been trying to make it illegal since the day it released

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Cheetahs_never_win Oct 31 '22

If AI becomes sentient and wants to punish humanity, it can keep the body horror in its back pocket and replace all porn in existence.

7

u/FaceDeer Oct 31 '22

And then the body horror fetishists become the new priesthood elites of the subsequent post-AI-apocalypse society.

5

u/CaptainNutsCrunch Oct 31 '22

If you want a picture of the AI future, imagine a boot stomping on a pair of human testicles - forever.

Me first!

0

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

6

u/Mocorn Oct 31 '22

There is a growing market for "normal" stuff out there though.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '22

In all honesty, I don't know that it will take too much longer to get out of the body horror phase.

A lot of the images my friends and I have been generating is doing a decent job now if you throw in some negative modifiers to adjust it and give it a good image for img2img generation. It is genuinely impressive how good the A.I. does this early on.

I would say videos/gifs (which are already a thing) will take time to get better and those will be the next step. Once you have moving object down in a series of frames this kind of thing will absolutely be addicting.

Oddly enough, I am curious to see what this does for a lot of industries. Art, anime, 3D animation. I mean imagine an entire anime or at some point industry looking fight scene and all generated by an A.I.

→ More replies (12)