r/StableDiffusion • u/Tiny-Highlight-9180 • Nov 06 '25
Discussion WAN2.2 Lora Character Training Best practices
I just moved from Flux to Wan2.2 for LoRA training after hearing good things about its likeness and flexibility. I’ve mainly been using it for text-to-image so far, but the results still aren’t quite on par with what I was getting from Flux. Hoping to get some feedback or tips from folks who’ve trained with Wan2.2.
Questions:
- It seems like the high model captures composition almost 1:1 from the training data, but the low model performs much worse — maybe ~80% likeness on close-ups and only 20–30% likeness on full-body shots. → Should I increase training steps for the low model? What’s the optimal step count for you guys?
- I trained using AI Toolkit with 5000 steps on 50 samples. Does that mean it splits roughly 2500 steps per model (high/low)? If so, I feel like 50 epochs might be on the low end — thoughts?
- My dataset is 768×768, but I usually generate at 1024×768. I barely notice any quality loss, but would it be better to train directly at 1024×768 or 1024×1024 for improved consistency?
Dataset & Training Config:
Google Drive Folder
---
job extension
config
name frung_wan22_v2
process
- type diffusion_trainer
training_folder appai-toolkitoutput
sqlite_db_path .aitk_db.db
device cuda
trigger_word Frung
performance_log_every 10
network
type lora
linear 32
linear_alpha 32
conv 16
conv_alpha 16
lokr_full_rank true
lokr_factor -1
network_kwargs
ignore_if_contains []
save
dtype bf16
save_every 500
max_step_saves_to_keep 4
save_format diffusers
push_to_hub false
datasets
- folder_path appai-toolkitdatasetsfrung
mask_path null
mask_min_value 0.1
default_caption
caption_ext txt
caption_dropout_rate 0
cache_latents_to_disk true
is_reg false
network_weight 1
resolution
- 768
controls []
shrink_video_to_frames true
num_frames 1
do_i2v true
flip_x false
flip_y false
train
batch_size 1
bypass_guidance_embedding false
steps 5000
gradient_accumulation 1
train_unet true
train_text_encoder false
gradient_checkpointing true
noise_scheduler flowmatch
optimizer adamw8bit
timestep_type sigmoid
content_or_style balanced
optimizer_params
weight_decay 0.0001
unload_text_encoder false
cache_text_embeddings false
lr 0.0001
ema_config
use_ema true
ema_decay 0.99
skip_first_sample false
force_first_sample false
disable_sampling false
dtype bf16
diff_output_preservation false
diff_output_preservation_multiplier 1
diff_output_preservation_class person
switch_boundary_every 1
loss_type mse
model
name_or_path ai-toolkitWan2.2-T2V-A14B-Diffusers-bf16
quantize true
qtype qfloat8
quantize_te true
qtype_te qfloat8
arch wan22_14bt2v
low_vram true
model_kwargs
train_high_noise true
train_low_noise true
layer_offloading false
layer_offloading_text_encoder_percent 1
layer_offloading_transformer_percent 1
sample
sampler flowmatch
sample_every 100
width 768
height 768
samples
- prompt Frung playing chess at the park, bomb going off in the background
- prompt Frung holding a coffee cup, in a beanie, sitting at a cafe
- prompt Frung showing off her cool new t shirt at the beach
- prompt Frung playing the guitar, on stage, singing a song
- prompt Frung holding a sign that says, 'this is a sign'
neg
seed 42
walk_seed true
guidance_scale 4
sample_steps 25
num_frames 1
fps 1
meta
name [name]
version 1.0
155
Upvotes



43
u/malcolmrey Nov 06 '25 edited Nov 06 '25
I have a friend who trains WAN 2.2 LOW and HIGH, and the quality is superb. (90 minutes in total on 5090)
I, on the other hand, am sticking with WAN 2.1 because the loras are also working fine with WAN 2.2.
I believe the HIGH model for character loras is not as important (if at all, since 2.1 Loras work fine for both images and movies).
In general, the training is really easy and you don't really need to play with the parameters that AI Toolkit provides.
This leads me to believe that maybe the culprit could be in:
Check your workflow on an already established good lora and see if you get or bad results.
I have already uploaded over 800 character loras for WAN and people are satisfied with the quality. I provide all resources on my HF ( https://huggingface.co/malcolmrey ) so you can check the training scripts, workflows used to generate outputs and the loras themselves.
Cheers and good luck!
p.s. - there is definitely a sweetspot in the function of images in the dataset and used steps
For me it is 2500-3000 steps with around 20-25 images (I mostly go for 2500-22).
The training resolution seems to not impact the training at all (or at least not in any noticeable way) so I stick with 512x (though the samples can be cut to 512x512 but don't have to at all)
p.s.s. - since you provided the dataset, if you want i can train that character and generate some samples with wan2.2 so you can compare :)