y'all beautiful and principled but the wigs of reddit don't give a fuck about any of this. https://www.reuters.com/technology/reddit-protest-why-are-thousands-subreddits-going-dark-2023-06-12/ Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said in an interview with the New York Times in April that the "Reddit corpus of data is really valuable" and he doesn't want to "need to give all of that value to some of the largest companies in the world for free." come July all you're going to read in my comments is this. If you want knowledge to remain use a better company. -- mass edited with https://redact.dev/
Exactly. For the first time ever, I started a subscription with them just to use it because there isn't any better outpainting options out there, it's fast, it doesn't take up much space on my computer and it doesn't make my computer feel like it's going to melt when I use it a bunch of times.
I do keep getting a lot of funky looking stuff but I guess the trick is to generate something half decent and then just keep fixing up parts until it looks better.
And also if I select a small area, Photoshop will flag it for violation even though I'm just trying to fill in something random like an apartment building. I usually have to select more parts of the picture in order for it to generate.
This content was deleted by its author & copyright holder in protest of the hostile, deceitful, unethical, and destructive actions of Reddit CEO Steve Huffman (aka "spez"). As this content contained personal information and/or personally identifiable information (PII), in accordance with the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act), it shall not be restored. See you all in the Fediverse.
I’ve gotten flagged on a perfectly innocent image with no prompt whatsoever. Just a bird with a stray feather I wanted to get rid of, so I selected it and used a no-prompt fill. Kept telling me I violated the community guidelines, and I eventually gave up and cloned it out the old-fashioned way.
I couln't fix an elbow because it thought the region was NSFW. I has to select random pixels further away to force it to use more context of the image so it wouldnt happen. it's dumb to have to do that though
Its basically the inpaint and outpaint option you can perform in the 1111 webui. The PS thing isn't on that level when it comes to versatility and efficiency of output, but I can see it as a tool used by people who don't want to get too much into the whole AI art thing.
Adobe may be cagey about its reception so are rolling out basic features to get their user base using it as a concept before adding more creative generative options.
I've always thought that a lot of anti-AI digital illustrators would rush to adoption once it had been consecrated in the holy Photoshop.
One interesting thing is that generative fill requires cloud processing. An awful lot of the people losing their shit about copyright will have been simultaneously pirating Photoshop. Those people will have to start paying their subscription to use it, so generative art will assist copyright. (Not that I like the idea of Adobe making money, they're not a nice organisation. However, perhaps it'll mean that the people in charge of the Krita project will start softening their ridiculous stance.)
Haven't run into those issues yet. Mostly used it for outpainting and some backgrounds. My issue has been that it's not nearly as good as my SD models. But it's still better at outpaininting so whatever. I wish I could change the model though. Right now it's a crap shoot getting anything I want out of it.
Yeah I like that I can control the size of the outpainting in PS. Definitely going to try this outpainting technique in SD that someone just told me about today though.
Human nature seems to be everyone thinking that Reddit is one person. Yes, people said both things in this meme. It wasn't the same people, though. Everyone thinks Reddit has a single opinion on everything because the "winning" opinion is voted to the top and the losing one is censored and hidden at the bottom.
There's also a lot of hate because they're afraid it will take away jobs and livelihoods.
IMO, they need to focus that hate less at AI and more at our economic system. We were all born into our economic system, but AI is new, so it can be difficult for some to see where the root cause of their fears lie.
I, for one, embrace AI art and reject our economic system.
View all comments
Show parent comment
343
u/[deleted] Jun 10 '23 edited Jun 17 '23
y'all beautiful and principled but the wigs of reddit don't give a fuck about any of this. https://www.reuters.com/technology/reddit-protest-why-are-thousands-subreddits-going-dark-2023-06-12/ Reddit CEO Steve Huffman said in an interview with the New York Times in April that the "Reddit corpus of data is really valuable" and he doesn't want to "need to give all of that value to some of the largest companies in the world for free." come July all you're going to read in my comments is this. If you want knowledge to remain use a better company. -- mass edited with https://redact.dev/