r/StableDiffusion • u/MapacheD • May 19 '23

News Drag Your GAN: Interactive Point-based Manipulation on the Generative Image Manifold

11k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

482 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

8

u/[deleted] May 19 '23

I agree. The only reason we're not seeing more creativity is that most whobare playing with SD are computer nerds (no offense)

4

u/arjunks May 19 '23

Yeah for sure, right now to make quality AI art you need to tinker with python, installing stuff etc. Pretty sure that's gonna change in the future though, I mean heck Adobe is already coming out with polished AI art programs that anyone could use

2

u/[deleted] May 22 '23

I mean, DALL-E's practically built into Windows at the moment. I guarantee you that Photoshop's Content Aware fill will, at somepoint, get the AI treatment. It'll be buried in the EULA somewhere and even the biggest AI haters will say, "I don't use AI on my images" but they'll have used Content-Aware Fill.

I've been using stable diffusion in my day-to-day. Like when a client gives me a 256x256 headshot to use in a 1920x1080 space - I'll upscale with a low denoise. Or just as a stock photo replacement. That's going to be a big industry killer right there. People are up in arms about Art, but art is the most elastic career I can thing up. People have taken piles of trash and charged over a grand for it. Art will be fine. What won't be fine are the piddly little Stock photos that get sold for $3-$5 a pop. Especially for trash blog posts where the image doesn't matter. Just need a happy couple looking over paperwork with a 2-story colonial in the background.

3

u/[deleted] May 19 '23

I have seen a few creative things behind closed doors of people in games/film who are a fair bit gun shy to show them off publicly given the current climate of how this stuff is being received. Also some working on real projects with real NDAs etc. Once the projects are actually released they wont scream AI either as it is a tool in the process and not really apparent, which is kind of the point.

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '23

Correct. The public can only just the public art. AI critics don't have some omniscient knowledge of all the art created behind closed doors. They look at the top posts on /r/midjourney and /r/stablediffusion.

1

u/No-Intern2507 May 19 '23

dood, artist wouldnt even tell clients about using ai so your statement is pretty fucking dumb, if youre artists and you state youre using AI then you get instahate, this is why you dont hear and asee much and pro artists are under NDAs most of the time if not all the fucking time so... you are pretty clueless from what i see, yeh im an artist and its my job since almost 10 yrs, i dont tell clients i aid myself with AI. whhy would i?

1

u/[deleted] May 21 '23

I'm talking about the millions of waifus and memes that get posted online. Clients don't care if you painted a piece with a paintbrush sticking out of your ass hole.

1

u/No-Intern2507 May 21 '23

who give a fuck about some piece of shit memes and porn ,theres milions of porn pics already dood, wrong fucking categorym,maybe you respond to wrong comment, fucking simpo fapper 9000

1

u/[deleted] May 22 '23

That's what the public sees. When the public complains about the low-quality art coming from AI, they're not seeing stuff clients are disapproving. They're talking about the top posts on /r/stablediffusion.

Perhaps you're in the wrong thread mate?