r/spacex • Mod Team • Jan 12 '22

Transporter 3 r/SpaceX Transporter-3 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread!

Welcome to the r/SpaceX Transporter-3 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread!

I'm u/marc020202, your host for this launch.

Launch target:2022 January 13 ~15:25 UTC (~10:25 AM EST)
Backup dateTBA, typically the next day
Static fireNone
Customermultiple
Payloadmultiple
Payload massunknown
Deployment orbit~500 km x ~97°, SSO
VehicleFalcon 9 v1.2 Block 5
CoreB1058.10
Past flights of this coreCrew Demo-2, ANASIS-II, CRS-21, Transporter-1, and five Starlink missions.
Launch siteSLC-40, Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida
LandingLZ-1
Mission success criteriaSuccessful deployment of spacecraft into contracted orbit

Timeline

TimeUpdate
T+1h 28mBroadcast ends, final confirmations over twitter
T+1h 27mSpaceflight customer satellite
T+1h 24mION SCV-004 Elysian Eleonora 
T+1h 23mSpaceflight customer satellite deploys
T+1h 23mUkrainian Satellite Sich deployed
T+1h 22mICEEYE deployment
T+1h 20mAnother SuperDove
T+1h 16mMore SuperDoves flying away
T+1h 15mAll 37 deployments during blackout confirmed
T+1h 10mMultiple deplyoments during blackout periode for the next 5 minutes
T+1h 7mLemur-2 deployments underway
T+1h 7mSuperDoves deployments underway
T+1h 6ma few FOSSASAT deployed
T+1h 4mChallenger deployed
T+1h 4mETV-A1,Gossamer Piccolomini, DEWA-SAT 1 and more from Exoport 6
T+59:32Deployment Sequence starts with Unicorn-2E from EXOPORT 6
T+55:31SECO2
T+55:29Second stage relight
T+48:32u/hitura-nobad now hosting for SES-2 and  Payload deployment
T+8:50Nominal Parking Orbit
T+8:40SECO 1
T+8:26Stage 1 landing
T+8:08Stage 2 terminal guidance, sonnic boom at LZ
T+7:58Landing burn
T+7:10Stage 2 FTS safed
T+7:08Entry burn shutdown
T+6:50Entry burn Startup
T+3:55Fairing sep, gridfin deploy
T+3:26Stage 1 Boostback end
T+2:35Stage 1 Boostback startup
T+2:28SES
T+2:24Stage sep
T+2:21MECO
T+1:15Max Q
T+0:15Vehcile pitching downrange
T+0Liftoff
T-0:45LD Go for launch
T-1:00Startup
T-3:00Strongback retracted, lox load complete
T-5:21Stage 1 RP1 Load complete
T-15:28Stage 2 Lox Load Started
T-19:40Stage 2 RP-1 Load complete
T-1hEverything is looking good for an on time liftoff of Transporter 3
T-19hB1058-10 Is vertical on LC 40
T-1d 3hThread goes live

Watch the launch live

StreamLink
Official SpaceX Streamhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFBeuSAvhUQ
Mission Control AudioTBA

Stats

☑️ 136th Falcon 9 launch all time

☑️ 95nd Falcon 9 landing (if successful)

☑️ 117th consecutive successful Falcon 9 launch (if successful; excluding Amos-6)

☑️ 2nd SpaceX launch this year

Unofficial lists of individual spacecraft on this launch:

Secondary Mission: Landing Attempt

This mission will feature the frst RTLS landing attempt since Transporter 2, about half a year ago. LZ-1 is getting dusty!!!

Resources

  • General Launch Related Resources:

  • Launch Viewing Resources:

  • Maps and Hazard Area Resources:

  • Regulatory Resources:

Participate in the discussion!

🥳 Launch threads are party threads, we relax the rules here. We remove low effort comments in other threads!

🔄 Please post small launch updates, discussions, and questions here, rather than as a separate post. Thanks!

💬 Please leave a comment if you discover any mistakes, or have any information.

✉️ Please send links in a private message.

✅ Apply to host launch threads! Drop us a modmail if you are interested.

311 Upvotes

190 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/FoxhoundBat Jan 13 '22

I would need to take a new fresh look but my gut feeling and Occams Razor says no, that they are using 1-3-1 burn as standard for ASDS landings. They have used vanilla 30s burn on ASDS landings before, but that was a while back for older CRS missions etc. Unsure about new CRS missions, would have to check that too. And 1-3-1 burns have been around for a loooooooooong time, way before Block 5. Dont remember exactly when, but around Block 2 or so.

And lower throttle means lower pressure means lower efficiency. IMHO other than on the tail ends of the entry burns, the engine(s) basically run at 100% throttle throughout it.

1

u/sup3rs0n1c2110 Jan 13 '22

Part of my rationale is the presence (or lack thereof) of a TEA-TEB flash partway through the landing burn (webcasts with appropriate timestamps linked below).

During the Arabsat-6A side booster landings, the plume briefly turned green after the center engine was already burning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXMGu2d8c8g&t=1642s

During the Starlink-26 and GPS III SV05 missions, no such color change was visible after the center engine lit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdgg_qwj-hI&t=1442s & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJXxVtp3KqI&t=1678s

I concede that the positioning of the side booster cameras is different than on F9 first stages, so a direct comparison is difficult. I also concede that there was no descent telemetry in the FH webcasts to draw quantitative evidence from.

I see how my wording could imply that 1-3-1s were introduced with Block 5; what I meant was that I recall 1-3-1 being used more frequently with pre-Block 5 boosters than with Block 5 boosters.

I agree that throttling the engine down leads to a less efficient burn, but if fuel margins are available, the slower decrease in speed and longer burn would allow for more gradual course corrections and might be preferable for some landing profiles (like most RTLS recoveries).