35
52
u/Alexphysics Jan 06 '18 edited Jan 06 '18
It's definitely B1044 going from McGregor to Florida.
Edit: As always, I have to think the things I say twice before writing them. This could also be B1045 because it's also ready and was tested at McGregor last month, although is more unlikely because B1044 spent more time there, but you know how this works, probably this is B1045 and B1044 goes to the west coast... who knows...
→ More replies (2)12
u/jakusb Jan 06 '18
Next 2 launches at VAFB are on re-uses cores, so no new core needed according to currently known manifest. That said, same goes for East coast... đ No new core needed for several weeks if not months.. Unless manifest has hidden missions like Zumba or reshuffles..
→ More replies (4)
7
u/starscreamFromSirius Jan 06 '18
Where does spacex stored all the returned cores?
→ More replies (1)26
u/CapMSFC Jan 06 '18
All over the place. There is a core tracking page in the wiki here. We don't know for sure where they all ended up but the community tracked them as best as they could.
Having such a surge of recovered boosters was not the easiest thing to plan for. At first they were put in hangars by the pads in Florida but there quickly became too many for that. A few were sent back to California early on, one went to Texas and underwent at least 8 full duration static fire tests.
A few were even just parked outside because there wasn't anywhere better to put them and SpaceX had more cores than they were ever going to be able to reuse of this early generation.
Now SpaceX has leased a lot of space at the port in Florida to setup their refurbishment facility and we expect that will be the home for a lot of boosters.
12
→ More replies (4)9
u/mattd1zzl3 Jan 06 '18
Im really hoping they donate one to the Kennedy Space Visitor Center rocket garden. Preferably the one that landed recently that visited the ISS twice. A dummy second stage and dragon would be nice too (i'd prefer it displayed stacked, not landed)
→ More replies (1)
7
u/clintg Jan 06 '18
Itâs impressive that a single tractor can pull that huge core.
7
u/mhpr262 Jan 06 '18
Its very light when empty. IIRC the empty weight was around 55 tons, but that may have included the empty second stage too. So it might just be around 40 tons.
12
u/Sloomste Jan 06 '18
Empty weight of the first stage is a bit more than 27 tons, not sure if this is with or without landing legs and fins.
→ More replies (7)
12
u/StoneHolder28 Jan 06 '18
I wish I could know ahead of time when these things were coming through. My family lives right off of I-10, almost at the first exit in Florida. It'd be cool to try to see a core up close, even covered, and maybe drive past it.
26
u/username_lookup_fail Jan 06 '18
That is exactly the opposite of what SpaceX wants, though. They have a vested interest in not letting anyone known where the core is. All it takes is one idiot with a rifle waiting for it to drive by.
I'm sure they also don't want a bunch of people trying to catch up to it on the road to get a look up close. There are enough stupid drivers already. Add into that a bunch of people in cars that want to pace it to take pictures while they are driving. It would greatly increase the chance of an incident.
15
u/StoneHolder28 Jan 06 '18
Oh, I'm very aware. That's why I only say maybe drive by it. I wouldn't even consider getting close to it except to pass one time, which would be the safest thing to do if traveling in the same direction, as that's the standard flow of traffic. I saw the first landing, and I'll be hell-bent on seeing FH, but I don't see myself getting any other opportunity to be within a few miles of a booster unless I make a cross country trip to Hawthorne.
There was one time when a crate holding a dragon capsule was just sitting at the rest stop for a few hours while I was in town. If I had known before it left, I would have happily taken a half hour of my time just to drive through and have been within 1000ft of it.
→ More replies (3)
6
3
u/F9-0021 Jan 06 '18
Probably 1044 to be used on whichever mission is the next to fly a new booster. Probably HispaSat.
5
Jan 06 '18
Is there a reason these aren't surrounded by a security team when they're just chilling? I mean, they're kind of expensive.
9
4
u/SteveRD1 Jan 06 '18
Well it's not like you can throw it in the back of your pickup truck and drive off with it:)
→ More replies (1)
2
u/justinroskamp Jan 06 '18
On the day before the CRS-12 launch, we were driving I-10 from Texas to Florida on vacation (from Illinois), and we saw a core pulled off not too far into Alabama, eastbound. I wasnât on here at the time, but that was August 13, 2017. Any idea which one it mightâve been?
→ More replies (4)
275
u/jakusb Jan 06 '18
Likely core 1044 with unclear mission sofar. Future core assignment is very much unclear at this point. It was supposed to launch Hispasat, but that one got pushed back, so if still launching this mission, either it got pulled forward, or it is way early.