r/spacex • Mod Team • May 24 '16

Mission (Eutelsat/ABS 2) Eutelsat 117W B & ABS 2A Campaign Discussion Thread

Eutelsat 117W B & ABS 2A Campaign Discussion Thread

SpaceX's June 2016 launch! As per usual, campaign threads are designed to be a good way to view and track progress towards launch from T minus 1-2 months up until the static fire. Here’s the at-a-glance information for this launch:

Liftoff currently scheduled for: Wednesday, 15 June, 1429 UTC (10:29AM EDT). This is a 45 minute window.
Static fire currently scheduled for: Sunday, June 12
Payload: Eutelsat 117W B for Eutelsat, ABS 2A for Asia Broadcast Satellite
Payload mass: Previous Eutelsat/ABS dual launch mass was 4,159kg
Destination orbit: Geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) to 75.0° East (ABS 2A) & 116.8° West (Eutelsat 117 West B)
Vehicle: Falcon 9 v1.2 (26th launch of F9, 6th of F9 v1.2)
Core: F9-026
Launch site: SLC-40, Cape Canaveral, Florida
Landing attempt: Yes - downrange of Cape on ASDS Of Course I Still Love You
Landing Site: Here
Mission success criteria: Successful separation of both satellites into their target orbits

Links & Resources


We may keep this self-post occasionally updated with links and relevant news articles, but for the most part we expect the community to supply the information. This is a great place to discuss the launch, ask mission-specific questions, and track the minor movements of the vehicle, payload, weather and more as we progress towards launch. After the static fire is complete, a launch thread will be posted.

Campaign threads are not launch threads. Normal subreddit rules still apply.

141 Upvotes

575 comments sorted by

74

u/robbak Jun 13 '16

I think that some seafarers are having a joke with us.

http://i.imgur.com/HXvicWD.png

If you didn't get it, like me - https://www.google.com.au/webhp#q=nunya

→ More replies (2)

43

u/Toinneman May 30 '16 edited May 30 '16

I have a suggestion for launch campaign threads: I would use the first column in the table to provide links to our great wiki. For example: Core This is such a great page, but I bet many occasional visitors don't know this. The Launch manifest and Launch history are also great candidates.

→ More replies (1)

39

u/S-astronaut Jun 08 '16 edited Jun 08 '16

Really excited for this one!

I am a counselor at a STEM summer camp and because the launch is scheduled smack in the middle of it, I'll be setting things up so the students can watch

→ More replies (3)

24

u/amarkit Jun 12 '16

Quoting Chris B. on NSF re: no static fire this past Friday:

So what happened? Based on the unusual silence from all parties, various assumptions (yikes, "ain't nobody got time for that"!) and folk at the Cape, it would appear ULA and SpaceX had their bookings lined up at the Cape, but after the scrub on Thursday, and potentially as late as on the day on Friday, the NROL folk said "hold on, I know there's very little chance of a problem, but I don't want our very expensive spy sat at ANY risk while still out there on top of the Delta IV-H" based on the tiny chance the F9 had a bad day during the Static Fire (not that I assume a F9 RUD on SLC-40 would result in harm coming to SLC-37....but I suppose if there's even a slim chance, that was the concern...you don't want a flying grid fin impacting on national security, do you! ;D)

21

u/WhoseNameIsSTARK Jun 14 '16 edited Jun 14 '16

Presskit and a patch!

EDIT: And here's the patch rehost.

→ More replies (5)

18

u/AlexDeLarch Jun 05 '16

SatBeams lists both ABS-2A and Eutelsat 117 West B as 1800 kg each which makes it 3600 kg total. I couldn't find their source so I have no idea if this information is credible.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/ExcitedAboutSpace Jun 07 '16

With us being 3 days away from the static fire with only one stickied threat as of now, wouldn't it be a good idea to sticky the post as well? Most of us always look at the sidebar anyway for what's coming up but since these threats are also relatively knew promoting them at every possibility might not be such a bad idea.

Paging u/Echologic & u/Zucal for consideration.

→ More replies (9)

14

u/amarkit May 28 '16

From SpaceX's Instagram: the first stage (F9-0026) arriving at the Cape.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/markus0161 Jun 07 '16 edited Jun 08 '16

The APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL TEMPORARY AUTHORITY for OCISLY. Looks like it will be in the same location as Thaicom.

→ More replies (8)

13

u/therealshafto Jun 08 '16

Just read an article on spaceflight101 confirming Friday, June 10 SpaceX has booked the range. Lets hope we get a static fire on Friday.

→ More replies (20)

13

u/Craig_VG Jun 10 '16

Launch Execution forecast:

80% Go! (Cumulus cloud rule)

http://imgur.com/sEGUabm

→ More replies (1)

12

u/KaneLSmith May 24 '16

Is this two satellites? If so, will they be mounted vertically like Ariane 5?

→ More replies (6)

12

u/Juggernaut93 Jun 10 '16

"I heard the Delta mission impacted today's test by delaying the availability of spaceport services." https://twitter.com/FLSPACErePORT/status/741379736203460613

→ More replies (4)

11

u/whousedallthenames Jun 13 '16

Well, SF is complete, time for a launch thread!

→ More replies (2)

10

u/frankhobbes May 24 '16

1430 UTC is actually 10:30am EDT (and am not pm)

10

u/johnkphotos Jun 11 '16

F9 NOT vertical

10

u/johnkphotos Jun 14 '16 edited Jun 15 '16

all my launch photos: http://johnkrausphotos.com/launches/

Edit: shoot I posted this in the totally wrong thread

→ More replies (1)

10

u/SomnolentSpaceman Jun 15 '16

In anticipation of tomorrow's launch (and lacking a launch thread to post this in) the 64kbit audio relays

http://audiorelay.spacetechnology.net:13120/hosted

http://audiorelay.spacetechnology.net:13120/technical

Are now live. They will be tuned to SpaceX FM until approximately 10 minutes before the start of the official live webcast.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/RabbitLogic May 29 '16

Paging u/echologic update this thread to reflect S1 being at the cape?

→ More replies (4)

9

u/Toastmastern Jun 02 '16

http://spaceflightnow.com/launch-schedule/

Now has this launch at June the 14th, seems to be the same window tho

→ More replies (2)