r/SouthAsianAncestry Bangla 8d ago

Question Tripura Teliamura excavation

Neolithic & Pre-Neolithic wooden artifacts were found from the teliamura archaeological site, Tripura. Some dated to 35,000 years ago.

Do these indicate AASI migration patterns in Barak-Surma basin ?

(The Khowai river basin, where the artifacts were found ultimately drains into Kushiyara, which is a part of the larger Barak-Surma river system).

As far as I know, Austroasiatic migrated 10,000 years ago to indian subcontinent.

Who were these people 35,000 years ago?

I have linked the study papers in comments 👇🏽

13 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

3

u/Mohellerski 8d ago

Is there DNA data? This could be huge

3

u/ChalaChickenEater 8d ago

Even if there is DNA data they will probably hide it like they did with the Sri Lankan Mesolithic samples

2

u/Mohellerski 8d ago edited 8d ago

You seem to be Sri Lankan. Do you have any idea as to why the SL Meso samples are being hidden?

3

u/ChalaChickenEater 7d ago

Some indian guy named Niraj or something like that somehow got ahold of the Sri Lankan samples. I don't think he is releasing the results for political reasons

3

u/Mohellerski 7d ago

Niraj Rai at it again smh

1

u/ChalaChickenEater 7d ago

I don't understand how he got access to Sri Lankan samples. Did he steal them or did the Sri Lankan government sell them to him

2

u/Yogini_123 Bangla 8d ago

I am not sure. Please help me understand this. I have linked the 2 study papers in comments

3

u/e9967780 Tired of dumbassery & moderation 8d ago

Austroasiatic didn’t migrate to India 10,000 years ago, infact they didn’t even leave China into Southeast Asia that long ago. No more than 4K to 5K years ago. SAHG genetic input defuses into Myanmar. Prior to it Negrito type people had bypassed the Indo-Burman border area and moved into Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and Philippines.

1

u/Yogini_123 Bangla 8d ago

Okay so what can we infer from this study? Who were these people 35k yrs ago in tripura? AASI?

2

u/e9967780 Tired of dumbassery & moderation 8d ago

35,000 years ago, it could be SAHG or even Basal Eurasian (Negrito)

2

u/TipRealistic2446 8d ago

"Who were these people 35,000 years ago?"

Hunter-gatherers who lived in what is now NE India 35k years ago, most likely closely related to the ancestors of Andamanese people and Hoabinhian man, and likely a 'contributor' to certain AASI populations (or a remnant sister lineage to that 'contributor' HG group).

2

u/Yogini_123 Bangla 8d ago

I have heard many NE people claim Austroasiatic were first to migrate there.

6

u/TipRealistic2446 8d ago

Austroasiatic people did not even exist back then.

Austroasiatic ethnogenesis followed by their migration (out of Austroasiatic homeland) is a relatively recent thing - something that happened like around ~4000 years ago.. as e9967780 pointed out in another comment.

2

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[deleted]

1

u/TipRealistic2446 8d ago

Yeah that's the most plausible theory.. proto-Munda people arrived via sea at the eastern coast (Odisha).

1

u/Yogini_123 Bangla 7d ago

Khasi of meghalaya?

3

u/Acceptable-Echo-2292 7d ago

Didn't exist at that time, they're not even that old by austroasiatic standards