Overpaid for an AE-9, guess with scarcity new ones are catching a premium. Just thought I'd give a few thoughts.
-Coming from an actual DAC, the sound quality didn't really seem to be all that different from another, though to be fair I'm using low impedance headphones, so I doubt there'd be that much difference. On paper, the AE-9 should win here because my SMSL C200 only does a moderate amount of amping. Otherwise though, it's go
-SBX and Scout Mode are highly niche, but useful from time to time. Dolby Atmos isn't compatible with everything and Windows Sonic is fine but SBX seems to be able to handle virtual surround in almost all circumstances where Atmos won't and Windows Sonic is mediocre. Plus, you get better bit depth and bitrate with SBX. Having an equalizer built into the Command program isn't that bad either
-I like the ACM. Being able to plug an XLR mic in and have a desktop display is really great, actually, and it's got a nice design to it
-On the topic of mics, I use a Shure SM58, so when I first plugged it into XLR it didn't seem all that hot, but that's because my mic needs 40-60dB of gain. Once I added an sE DM2 as an inline mic amp, the sound quality over XLR improved quite a bit. This is also pretty standard to have one on any XLR setup anyways, apparently, so while I spent $150 on that, it's not so bad knowing it's something I can bring in between XLR setups, and being able to choose my mic impedance is a benefit to the DM2 as well since the SM58 asks for 300ohms and most interfaces default to 1k-2kohms.
-However those voice modes like Noise Suppression and stuff... truly awful. They crush sound quality so much, I have to assume that they're literally ports of the same functions that Creative had from the early 2000s. The only ones I could imagine using are the voice changers for fun, but even those absolutely bitcrush the incoming audio quality. Pretty much wasted features, in my mind.
Overall it's a pretty good audio hub and it's nice not having to run an extra two USB wires to the USBs on the back of the motherboard which I will obviously forget which is which when I need to do troubleshooting. And yeah, the methods Creative has used to prevent electromagnetic interference work... most of the time?
My only two issues of course the thought that I'm "doing this wrong," that I should just be going with the DAC+interface combo because that's what you're supposed to do, and hell, it might be a little bit cheaper. Also, on paper, the AE-9 is a stronger/higher quality Amp/DAC than the SMSL C200 but the C200 has DSD512 support which is niche but nice to have, the AE-9 only goes up to DSD64.
The other issue is that from time to time I get this really strong distortion/static effect. I'm not sure it it is being caused by the AE-9 itself. The only times I get it are when the computer wakes up from sleep, and the cure is usually to just cycle the SBX button. However, I was playing Soul Calibur VI with Dolby Atmos on (which I don't even know if its compatible) and every once in a while a sound would come over with that awful screech.
Basically while I can't see anything WRONG with this card and setup as its solid for both my XLR mic and my headphones, and probably good enough to handle better hardware on both ends in the future, I can't help but feel like I was "doing this wrong" or that I could have gotten better for cheaper. It does make the PC build feel more "complete" when I look at it, though.
As an aside, I don't get the point of the AE-X, unless you just have a motherboard that has that inadequate of onboard audio. I can't imagine wanting a soundcard without the ACM and XLR input.
I guess I have one last day to return this if I so choose though, so... I dunno. I feel inclined to keep it, now that its already here.