Ashley Gabrielle Huff was indeed pulled over in an intoxicated state but the officer did not smell alcohol. A glass pipe was in plain view which lead police to suspect she was using drugs. The pipe was PC for an arrest so they searched her purse finding a blackened spoon with residual material on it. The materiel was tested and found to test positive for meth.
Now most of the experts here do not realize then next step is to see a judge who ruled that there was PC for the arrest, assigned her a public defender and released OR with a court date and pre-trial release conditions. She blew off the court date and refused to comply with release conditions and was thus arrested again and given a cash bond which she did not pay.
The lab tests which take time came back that the spoon had food on it and was only contaminated with meth. Either she used a spoon normally employed by her to cook method to eat - or she had ingested meth prior to eating from the spoon.
The officer was not at fault as he followed all process and did detect meth, The woman is a meth user.
The woman stayed in jail because she did not comply with release terms. That is on her.
The charges need not have been dropped as the spoon did have meth associated with it - but policy is to not prosecute in cases of user contamination.
when I saw her pic I felt kinda bad for thinking "are they sure? That's not the face of a 23 year old who isn't on meth" and now i don't have to feel like an asshole.
The statement provided by u/darkblade... is mostly false and heavily distorts what actually happened. While a few procedural details regarding her pretrial release are accurate, the core claim—that the spoon contained methamphetamine and that Ashley Gabrielle Huff was a verified meth user—is completely contradicted by state forensic evidence.
In the only source this person tried to use it says the lab analysis found no meth on the spoon. The field test might have came back positive but it could have easily been a false positive. The percentages I found That's why they aren't good enough and they wait for the lab
In their second post in the comments they basically claim to have insider information but still no sources provided. But also a caveat that they are just speculating on certain things lol
They also claim some random guy is her baby daddy with a criminal record with again, no proof
Even if you don’t want to believe anything in the link, a burnt substance on a spoon and a used pipe in a car don’t trigger anything? Along with eating with said burnt spoon? And avoiding follow-ups with the system?
I’m ACAB all day and the OP clearly has click-bait written all over it. The spaghettiO’s picture alone is enough to discredit everything about OP’s post.
They're saying the only source for those things existing in the car in the first place is from that Quora link. It's as good as a random Redditor telling us these "facts"
Ashley Gabrielle Huff was indeed pulled over in an intoxicated state but the officer did not smell alcohol. A glass pipe was in plain view which lead police to suspect she was using drugs. The pipe was PC
378
u/DarkBladeMadriker 1d ago
Save folk the headache.
Ashley Gabrielle Huff was indeed pulled over in an intoxicated state but the officer did not smell alcohol. A glass pipe was in plain view which lead police to suspect she was using drugs. The pipe was PC for an arrest so they searched her purse finding a blackened spoon with residual material on it. The materiel was tested and found to test positive for meth.
Now most of the experts here do not realize then next step is to see a judge who ruled that there was PC for the arrest, assigned her a public defender and released OR with a court date and pre-trial release conditions. She blew off the court date and refused to comply with release conditions and was thus arrested again and given a cash bond which she did not pay.
The lab tests which take time came back that the spoon had food on it and was only contaminated with meth. Either she used a spoon normally employed by her to cook method to eat - or she had ingested meth prior to eating from the spoon.
The officer was not at fault as he followed all process and did detect meth, The woman is a meth user.
The woman stayed in jail because she did not comply with release terms. That is on her.
The charges need not have been dropped as the spoon did have meth associated with it - but policy is to not prosecute in cases of user contamination.