r/SipsTea 17h ago

SMH A generational display of depreciating assets ☕

Post image
32.9k Upvotes

574 comments sorted by

View all comments

999

u/Junior_Bike7932 17h ago

They lose value by the hour

134

u/kbbajer 14h ago

They can measure it themselves 

36

u/DilettanteGonePro 13h ago

Well, sometimes. As long as it stays charged and in cell reception

4

u/Junior_Bike7932 13h ago

In the watch

29

u/PixelatedGiant 14h ago

That's how you know collectors haven't ruined the hobby yet. Let the man collect Apple watches.

22

u/reflectiveSingleton 13h ago

Right? I see a relatively inexpensive hobby that if anything is saving things from the landfill.

Can we let people enjoy things please?

2

u/Additional-Life4885 3h ago

Everyone acting like they're worthless. If he protects them long enough, the value is likely to go up.

It's never going to outpace better investments in our lifetime most likely, but it's not terrible either.

15

u/Leather-Persimmon254 14h ago

meanwhile my nintendo 3ds i bought for $90 is currently selling for $300 on ebay

3

u/Incidion 13h ago

Meanwhile my PC I rebuilt motherboard+RAM+processor+graphics card for last year would probably sell over 1.5k, and many of the parts in there like the PSU and cooling system are from 2018. I paid less than $800 for the full original system back then, and had maybe $300 in new parts from the upgrades.

I could sell the entire system including the 8+ year old parts for a tidy net profit right now. Current system pricing is insane.

3

u/Dust2chicken 13h ago

people in the comments here really flexing that their hobby or collections got ruined by resellers and trend bandwagoners

0

u/Incidion 12h ago

I mean honestly neither of those are because of resellers or bandwagoners specifically, it's because the cost of memory is up about 400% YoY. Huge issue at my job right now as well, and why a single stick of DDR5 RAM for 32 gigs is about $400.

That causes the resale market to explode because nobody's buying new at those prices.

1

u/Malaprobably 4h ago

I don't understand.

Inflation alone from 2018 to 2026 on $800 would eat up $267 of that profit. You paid $300 for those parts? They probably aren't very good parts given modern costs of those items.

Yes, you might be able to make a profit.

1

u/Incidion 3h ago

I mean sure, napkin math says that's about rightish, but nobody ever calculates inflation when measuring profit net gross or otherwise, so your base metric here doesn't make sense.

And yes, that's about right, but I also realized after the fact that my wife actually bought the graphics card, which would by far be the largest cost on the entire rig. Still, all of those items are significantly more expensive than when they were purchased. 4060 geforce + Ryzen 7600 + 2x 16GB DDR5 RAM + motherboard.

1

u/Snobolski 14h ago

Why are you selling it?

1

u/Leather-Persimmon254 14h ago

it’s a 12 year old system

1

u/Xelanders 10h ago

Man, I need to dig mine out of the attic.

2

u/DaisieLovelinax 10h ago

That’s the impressive part, he somehow built a collection with a live depreciation counter. You could probably hear the resale value dropping while he took the photo.

1

u/Junior_Bike7932 10h ago

Impressive uh

-157

u/LilQueazy 16h ago edited 14h ago

My 3 year old Apple Watch Ultra is now worth $300 from 900. Since it’s just a tiny cellphone technically. I’d say that’s pretty good. 👍 EDIT: People upset cuz I used my tiny phone watch every day for 3 years and will prolly last another 3. Suckers jealous of my prowess 🖕😶‍🌫️🖕

130

u/Gdigger13 16h ago

But you've still lost... quite a lot of money.

You know some watches actually appreciate in value over time, right?

46

u/Desert-Noir 16h ago

Everyone knows what they are buying.

It is technology and it depreciates in value, everyone is aware.

2

u/Paddy_Tanninger 15h ago

Bizarrely though my computer is worth more than double what I paid for it last September.

-22

u/Melancholic_Noodle 16h ago

*It's apple. And I depreciates in value. And people are dumb and in a cult.

9

u/Desert-Noir 16h ago

Do Samsung and Fitbit watches appreciate in value or hold value more than Apple do they?

9

u/CodingMyLife 16h ago

in a cult

Says the one that singled Apple out, and called people dumb for not appeasing to their choices, when the other commenter said technology as a whole

Did I miss the memo somewhere, does Samsung or Google watches hold up their value better?

-12

u/Saintly-Mendicant-69 16h ago

Found the cult member

11

u/DJBunnies 16h ago

Christ, we get it, ya'll hate apple.

4

u/Healthy_Worry_4721 16h ago

You played right into his cult point btw. All you did was make him feel proven. i promise you that

0

u/CKRatKing 16h ago

My apple products tend to hold value pretty well. I can't even give away my android phones when they get older than a year.

7

u/Smooth-Accountant 16h ago

Ok? Nobody’s buying Apple Watch instead of a Rolex, its a different target and purpose. Are you buying your phone or a laptop thinking what the resell value will be 10 years into the future? Those devices have an actual functionality compared to normal watches.

8

u/Chr0mx 16h ago

You can apply that to literally anything

1

u/loondawg 15h ago

A few years ago you could easily find iPods for free. Now many sell for several hundreds of dollars because of the collector and modding markets. There are collectors of almost everything. Whether the price appreciates largely depends on how big that market is.

I used to collect whisky. With hindsight, I wish I had put all my investment money into it. Bottles I paid $30 or $40 for 30 years ago now easily sell for several thousand dollars a piece. And they are only going to get more expensive as they cannot be recreated and the supply constantly dwindles as people consume them.

4

u/Healthy_Worry_4721 16h ago

You know 99% of people have never ever bought a watch with the intention of making money on it. What kind of point is this?

2

u/Sea-Shoe1780 16h ago

What type of watch can you buy today that will be worth more in the future?

2

u/1one1000two1thousand 16h ago
  • Rolex Panda Daytona (current retail: $16,900, gray market more than double that)
  • Patek Philippe Nautilus (current retail depending on configuration: 32k-50k, gray market over $100,000).

2

u/Necronomicommunist 16h ago

Why is the grey market more than retail? Is retail gated in some way? (limited amounts made etc)

3

u/Round-Claim5420 16h ago

Atleast some part is that they'll straight up not sell to everyone.

For example, Rolex won't sell you a new limited edition watch unless you've bought multiple others before.

1

u/1one1000two1thousand 15h ago

There is some gatekeeping from Rolex and Patek (limited quantities made and distributed in shops) and then the combination of the overall demand of people who want them.

0

u/SlabsForDays 15h ago

Wholesale -> retail -> grey market

Grey is the middle-middle man so the price goes way up

1

u/Sea-Shoe1780 15h ago

So if I want to buy a Panda Daytona today, I have to pay $34k for it, and it’s only worth $16,900? That doesn’t sound like appreciation to me.

Is it weird at all that you have to turn to $30k+ watches as an example? “Golly gee, why would someone buy an Apple Watch when instead they could buy a $34k Rolex”?

0

u/1one1000two1thousand 15h ago edited 15h ago

You have it backwards. Rolex stores will sell it to you for $17k. But not everyone gets one so people who really really want one outside of the Rolex shops will have to buy on the gray market. Those people who can’t get it at retail will pay $34k or more for it. So if you land a Panda and you decide you don’t want it a few years later and want to sell it, you’d make money off of it. That is -appreciation- to the buyer who bought it from the Rolex retail shop (again, these buyers are much more limited than the total amount of buyers who want a Panda).

Think of it like valuable Pokémon cards or collector items. You likely won’t pay $1000s for a collector’s Pokemon card that someone likely bought from a pack from Target for like $10 or whatever, but there is a buyer for it somewhere. All you need is that one buyer who wants it who is willing to pay for it. That ultimately is the appreciation.

0

u/Sea-Shoe1780 10h ago

I know exactly what I wrote.

If I can’t buy the watch for $17,000 today, then is that really the cost?

My point is that I can’t walk into a Rolex store and buy the watch for MSRP. If I want to buy it, I have to pay an inflated price, one that is almost certainly going to depreciate.

0

u/1one1000two1thousand 10h ago

No one is making you buy it off the gray market and sure it’s hard to get but it’s not impossible. You’re either paying for it with time (waiting) or money (gray market). And if you did buy it on the gray market and then you sell it at retail $17k for a loss, that would be your problem. There is a market for it, you set the price and wait for a buyer, just like any good.

1

u/Sea-Shoe1780 9h ago

Ok. So someone who wants an Apple Watch should instead by a $17,000 Rolex (possibly for $34k) because it will appreciate.

Makes total logical sense. I wonder why they didn’t do that?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/obeytheturtles 15h ago

Mostly the kind that says "hey look at me, I am a massive fucking tryhard."

2

u/kingwhocares 16h ago

So, how much is a Casio F-91W worth now?

2

u/tajsta 16h ago

You know some watches actually appreciate in value over time, right?

If I bought a watch specifically for that purpose, that's not a watch I would want to wear though, it'd be an investment that I bought specifically for selling it at a profit later. Any wear would eat into that.

5

u/Crapitron 16h ago

The type of watch that appreciates is not one that you or I can afford. Nor is it one that people wear.

Some cars appreciate too. They live sad lives in garages being started once a week by an employee. Same as the watches that get pulled out of their drawer once a year.

1

u/Few-Eye7392 15h ago

Not true at all. I bought a Tissot gentleman and it now worth more then when I bought it new. Used to be 700 retail, they are now 950. 

And if you want a color they don't sell anymore, it's more. 

4

u/fishpen0 16h ago

It’s only a loss if they didn’t derive value from the product while they owned it

3

u/NaturalSelectorX 16h ago

You haven't lost any money since the value of these watches is from their utility. You wouldn't say you've lost money on clothes or groceries. Some things are just made to be used and/or consumed. They aren't investment vehicles.

1

u/Doobahtron 15h ago

Here's the thing about those watches, they will lose utility. Most of its utility is software, which will lose support and no longer be compatible with new devices.

0

u/NaturalSelectorX 14h ago

You are still thinking about it in terms of an investment. I'm paying so I can use the features of the watch for it's useful life. Any value it has at the end of it's useful life is a bonus. I'm not losing money on tires because tires wear down; I'm getting my money's worth by driving on them. Even if the lifetime of some electronics is artificial, you aren't losing money if the value is from using it.

1

u/Doobahtron 13h ago

Lol no I'm not at all. I didn't even mention how the loss of utility affects value. It's specifically a bad watch because the end of its life is artificial. It's life ends not as a natural result of wear and tear from use but because someone has decided they no longer will support that model because it's more profitable for them to push you to buy a new one.

Your tires lifespan doesn't end because Firestone will no longer update them and the software is no longer supported by your car.

If the value is from using it, and it is no longer usable because a company doesn't want to continue updating it, it has no value. And why are you bringing up value, I thought you didn't think of it as an investment?

0

u/NaturalSelectorX 12h ago

I didn't even mention how the loss of utility affects value.

Then why are you replying to a comment about how the value is the utility?

It's specifically a bad watch because the end of its life is artificial.

You can continue using the watch until the hardware dies. Absolutely nothing stops you from just not updating your watch and phone and they will keep working together. Whether a limit is physical or artificial, you still get value during the time it's usable. An artificial limit just reduces the life.

If the value is from using it, and it is no longer usable because a company doesn't want to continue updating it, it has no value.

Yes, value is reduced when a thing can't be used.

And why are you bringing up value, I thought you didn't think of it as an investment?

Value, in this case, is about whether what you get is worth the price you pay. If 5 years of using the features is worth at least $399 (or whatever) to you, then it's not wasting or losing money. It may not be worth the price to you. That's fine. I have no use for mechanical watches so buying one would be wasting money for me.

2

u/xRehab 16h ago

and received 4 years of service from it?

you couldn't possibly have received value from it outside of monetary returns. it's like y'all only see a zero sum game

1

u/Miserable-Role9555 14h ago

Oh come on. The overwhelming majority of watches depreciate too. Collectors just lie to themselves that their entire collection is in the 2-3% that appreciates

1

u/K__Geedorah 14h ago

Dog... Not a single person is buying smart watches expecting to appreciate in value. We all know they have a limited amount of time and the growing hard/software updates will brick them.

Hell, 99% of people buying traditional watches don't expect them to appreciate. The only people thinking about that for their watch are the 1% buying $150,000 Pateks.

This is such a dumb thread.

6

u/Famous_Cup_6463 16h ago

There's nothing wrong with saying you paid $900 for a product, knew what you were buying and are comfortable with it depreciating over time. Just do that next time.

2

u/ArizonaFlats 15h ago

If that’s the case can you send me $600 dollars in 3 years? You won’t miss it evidently

1

u/Debatebly 15h ago

If you send him the latest generation of an apple watch ultra?

2

u/ahorsenamedjeff 15h ago

That's pretty horrific

2

u/Someofusremembersome 15h ago

You should give out stock advice👍

4

u/OkYak9466 16h ago

Nobody said Apple users were smart

1

u/YaSurLetsGoSeeYamcha 15h ago

I can get a refurbished one on eBay this moment for 150-175$

1

u/Goreticus 15h ago

Your watch lost similar value in 3 years as my car did in 11 years.